Steve Patterson on KDHX radio 8/10, 7PM
I’ll be a guest on KDHX’s Collateral Damage program Monday 8/10/09 from 7pm to 7:30pm. Use the comments below to suggest discussion topics. Tune in at 88.1FM or listen online at kdhx.org.
– Steve Patterson
I’ll be a guest on KDHX’s Collateral Damage program Monday 8/10/09 from 7pm to 7:30pm. Use the comments below to suggest discussion topics. Tune in at 88.1FM or listen online at kdhx.org.
– Steve Patterson
My brother’s subdivision, located in a far sprawling area within Oklahoma City’s huge city limits, is a curiosity to me. No doubt we have similar subdivisions in the St. Louis region. Every region in the US likely has a similar situation.
The subdivision is gated. Not just to outsiders but from one part to another – wouldn’t want the Riff Raff from 3 blocks away in our part of the same subdivision.
The sidewalks don’t leave the subdivision because the major roads outside the subdivision lack sidewalks. I can see the grocery store from his front walk but to get there requires a car trip.
Although they have plenty of room between the curbs & sidewalks, they have zero street trees. Apparently tree-lined streets are a bad thing? The one decorative tree in each front lawn is kept back so it can’t won’t shade the sidewalk.
The streets are not public but are privately owned & maintained by the home owners. All houses have 3-car garages – the minimum allowed. You can leave a non-commercial vehicle on your driveway but don’t think of leaving your car on the too wide subdivision streets overnight. Commercial vehicles (company SUV with name on the side, for example) must be kept in the garage.
The logic goes that parked cars on the street overnight is low class and tacky. To protect their home values, the streets must be free of vehicles. They live in an environment where the car is a must but they don’t want to see the cars at night.
I don’t get the logic at all.

To me the narrower tree-lined streets in older areas or New Urbanist areas like New Town at St. Charles (above) are so much more appealing, visually & functionally.
The 3-car wide driveways and the series of garage doors is much more an issue for me. Narrow streets with parked cars help slow traffic.
Are people selecting the suburban subdivision because they is what they want or are people buying in them because they are the current perception of the ideal living environment? Has anyone given it much thought?
Clearly the developers, in writing the rules for subdivisions, have set out guidelines that are counter to my way of thinking. It is not like buyers have any real choice — all the new development follows the same formula – except for the New Urbanist developments which are hard to build because zoning mandates the suburban/sprawl ideal.
I’d love to buy a house in such a subdivision and plant street trees after removing the original lawn ornament tree. I wouldn’t want to live there, just challenge their view of an ideal place to call home. But seriously, we’ve got a major sticking issue if people don’t want cars on the street overnight.
– Steve Patterson
Brian Spellecy of the blog, Downtown St. Louis Business, recently emailed me about bike stations. He was thinking about one for St. Louis and it got me thinking about one again.
Nearly four years ago on October 14th, 2005 I did a post (Four Flavors for the St. Louis Riverfront) reviewing the four riverfront proposals and their inclusion of a bike station:
All four proposals include a bike station near the Poplar Street Bridge, well under it. The design team showed a picture of the new bike station at Chicago’s Millennium Park as an example. I’ve been to Chicago’s bike station and it is an awesome facility complete with a bike rental area, indoor bike parking, a bike repair shop and a locker rooms complete with showers. Many cities are building bike stations to encourage bike commuting — giving cyclists a way to shower and change clothes before heading into the office. Chicago’s Millennium Park bike station has been criticized as being too far away from their business district. Chicago’s will seem downright close compared to us having a bike station under the PSB.
St. Louis needs a good bike station but the riverfront is not the right location. Somewhere in or near the Central Business District makes the most sense. Who is going to bike to work and then shower and then walk a mile or so to the office? Nobody. Good locations for a bike station do exist — one of the vacant blocks of the failed Gateway Mall or even the location of the pocket park on the Old Post Office Square.
The plaza is already built across from the Old Post Office and it lacks even a bike rack. Scratch that location off the list. Two blocks of the Gateway Mall are now the wonderful Citygarden. Two more blocks off the list of potential sites.
Remaining would be on or under part of the two city blocks that contain Kiener Plaza & the Morton May Amphitheater. This would be an excellent spot for offering bike rentals as well as food & drink sales via a connected kiosk.
Another is under the block containing the ‘Twain’ sculpture by Richard Serra, immediately west of Citygarden. Like Chicago’s Bike Station in Millennium Park, our station could be underground with a simple glass structure above grade. This would add a new level of activity to that block without competing visually with the Twain sculpture.
Of course a bike station can be fitted into an existing structure as well. A bike station provides secure bike parking, lockers, showers and often bike repair services. The idea is to provide a place where workers can bike downtown, shower & change for work. We have a number of buildings with vacant ground floor space that might be well suited for such a role.
The ones I know of are not owned by the municipality — rather they are part of a not-for-profit organization. Some cities likely help out such as getting the facility built and then leasing it to a group that manages the day to day operations.
Ideally we’d determine the center point of the greatest concentration of downtown workers and locate the bike station at that point.
If we want more cyclists/fewer cars downtown providing a bike station is a step in the right direction. A great facility could be viewed by businesses as a bonus to their workers — a reason to stay downtown or to relocate downtown.
– Steve Patterson
Private cars are not going anywhere anytime soon but I like to see policies designed to take away the massive advantage the car has over say mass transit.
Stimulus funds, as we know, are going toward many road projects. Yes, the road projects were “shovel ready” but only because that is all we seem to plan for.
The cash for clunkers program (officially the car allowance rebate system) has been well received:
According to a survey of car dealerships and 2,200 consumers by CNW Research, the average fuel economy of vehicles traded in last week was 16.3 miles a gallon, which is not much less than the 18 m.p.g. needed to qualify for a government rebate of $3,500.
The relatively small differential suggests that consumers have not been turning in the oldest, dirtiest and least fuel-efficient cars, but instead have been getting rid of their second and third cars, according to Art Spinella, who ran the survey.
The vehicles that consumers bought with their credits had average fuel efficiency ratings of 24.8 miles a gallon, he said.
Lawmakers hoped the cash for clunkers program, formally known as the Car Allowance Rebate System, would reduce America’s dependency on imported oil. But the early results of the program suggest that may not happen. The vehicles turned in were driven about 6,000 miles a year, he said. If the new vehicles are driven about 12,000 miles a year, the rough annual average, then consumers will actually use more fuel, not less.
“The energy independence argument did not ring true, at least so far,†Mr. Spinella said. (source)
There is much debate about the program. True, 2nd & 3rd cars are used as the trade in vehicle.  The new car will become the primary vehicle and the old primary vehicle will become the new secondary car in the household.
Some say the fuel efficiency requirements should have been higher. I agree. My guess is if they had been too high many of the new vehicles would have been foreign rather than domestic makes. Domestic makers simply focused too heavily on trucks & SUVs.
My 2004 Toyota Carolla, built in California, has a combined EPA of 28mpg. It is worth more than the rebate anyway. A 1994 Carolla still wouldn’t have qualified due to a combined EPA of 25mpg.
I looked up many other cars at fueleconomy.gov to see if they qualifed based on MPG. A 1994 Ford Crown Victoria just barely qualifies but a 1994 Ford Taurus does not. On one hand I’d like to see 20mpg cars be replaced with 30mpg vehicles. On the other you have to draw a line somewhere.
And clearly there has been no shortage of qualifying trade ins. You have to wonder if buyers are going to cheap used car lots to purchase a $1,000 clunker so they’d have a vehicle to qualify for the $4,500 rebate?
The clunker program is certainly a fast way to stimulate the economy. But it also shows how important the auto industry is to our economy. How will we ever change that fact?
At one time the St. Louis we made streetcars used by many cities. No reason why the shuttered Chrysler plant in Fenton couldn’t build modern low-floor streetcars for use in the Loop Trolley line and in many others. Someone has to build the trains for the high-speed rail lines being planned in the US.
Stimulus money needs to make it easier to use our private cars less often. Where is the rebate for trading in a clunker and buying a 90mpg scooter as a replacement? Or a 10-year transit pass?
– Steve Patterson
It opened 8 days before my 7th birthday. Crossroads Mall was a very big deal at the time. All the malls in Oklahoma City were on the other side of town. Now we’d have a mall less than 2 miles from home. I may have been in one of the other malls in town prior to the opening of Crossroads but I doubt it.
When Crossroads Mall opened in 1975 it was the 9th largest shopping mall in the United States, and the largest in Oklahoma. It is still the second largest mall in Oklahoma at 1.3 million square feet. (source)
West County Center in the St. Louis region, rebuilt and greatly expanded in 2002, is still smaller than Crossroads Mall.
When the mall opened in 1974 my parents were in their early 40s, as I am today. They saw downtown and retail districts die as new suburban malls took over. They did not shed a tear, they embraced the change.
Likewise as shopping patterns I don’t mourn the death of Crossroads mall. I should clarify that it is not totally dead – yet.
But when all four of your anchors are closed the diagnosis is not positive. The sign, above, lists four anchors as you enter — AMC (which is in its own building outside the mall),  Waldenbooks, Bath & Body Works and Chick-fil-A. Yes, Chick-fil-A is now listed on signage that used to list stores like Macy’s, Dillard’s, JC Penny, and Montgomery Ward. Yeah, good luck with Chick-fil-A as an draw.
On the directory they have severed off the four vacant anchor spaces as if they didn’t exist. I’m sure they wish they didn’t exist.
But from outside and inside it is obvious to the casual observer. The above space was Montgomery Wards, which closed in 2001. The East coast chain Steve & Barry’s opened in this space until they went Bankrupt in January 2009.
One by one the remaining long-term anchors all closed – JC Penny in 2007, Macy’s in March 2008, Dillard’s in December 2008. (source).
It appears all four anchor stores are owned separately from the mall as I spotted for sale signs with different real estate companies. If so that makes it harder to create a solution unless the mall owner sinks more money and buys all four anchor spaces. Then what? Raze it all?
Crossroads was so named for being at the crossroads of two interstates – I-35 and I-240. Retail centers have now developed along both so that rebuilding retail on this massive site would be a risky proposition.
Little has changed inside save for additional interior lighting. With the exception of the Chick-fil-A, the only remaining long-term tenant may be Spencer’s Gifts:
The location is exactly where it was in 1974. Although curious, I didn’t go inside. I hadn’t been in that store in 30 years.
In January the mall was in foreclosure:
Officials say Crossroads Mall could be put up for bids in about 60 days and stores in the mall will remain open for now.
Price Edwards & Co. is now managing the mall and senior vice president Jim Parrack says he hopes to find a buyer who will keep the property as a mall, but some analysts say it could be taken over by a government agency, a school or a medical organization. (source)
I’m not sure where it stands, not sure I care. In my lifetime I’ve seen the birth & death of this mall. Right now it is the roadside wreck you can’t help look at. It is time to call in Dr. Kevorkian, or a demolition crew, to finish it off.
As people return to the center and flock to newer strip centers this future of this mall as a mall is long over. Strip centers around the mall built in the last two decades are already housing offices for things like the state Department of Human Services. A Best Buy and the Toys R Us where I worked for 5 years are hanging on.
Like my parents I will not shed a tear at the loss of the old way of doing retail.
– Steve Patterson