To most residents of St. Charles County this is more urbanity than they ever thought they’d see on their side of the Missouri River.
A decade or more ago this site would’ve been developed as a big box with an even bigger parking lot. Smaller buildings would’ve dotted the perimeter. Visitors would’ve been expected to arrive via car and to drive to reach other buildings on the site. From my brief observations, it appears the planners have made sure pedestrians can reach every building via a sidewalk.
While I’m not going to give up my downtown loft to live here, it’s an improvement over old-school development patterns.
I didn’t feel I could be too harsh based on just driving through. So, later in February, I returned in my power wheelchair so I could spend more time there — to see how well it works…or doesn’t. Within the project boundaries it works fairly well, they’ve made a much better effort than most developments to make sure each business is accessible as a pedestrian. Attempting to reach adjacent & nearby developments proved difficult, though the blame for that isn’t necessarily the fault of this developer.
I arrived at just before 10am — in need of a bathroom. I knew the adjacent Quik Trip would be a good choice. Just how to get to it.
The internal site issues are pretty easy to correct, including a direct connection toward QT. Other problems, beyond the site, are more complex. St. Charles City, St. Charles County, MoDOT, etc all need to play a role in better connecting this site to its surroundings.
— Steve Patterson
Currently there are "13 comments" on this Article:
“NOBODY SEEMED TO PLAN A WAY FOR MOTORISTS TO WALK FROM THEIR CARS TO THE BUILDINGS!”
This one always gets me. You’d think that developers/designers would at least think about pedestrians as they pertain to arriving in their cars, but no, they rarely do. This really demonstrates how little thought is given to any kind of pedestrian accommodation…despite the fact that we have ADA laws. It’s almost like the people who are responsible for these things have never been pedestrians themselves.
It’s hard to imagine that so many violations exist in that single development–one after another! The number of violations almost makes me question if a single developer is involved, or if there are multiple developers involved, each doing his own thing and ignoring the other developers’ plans. If that is actually the case, then the governing municipal authority has the responsibility to connect the dots of the overall accessibility design and to insist on each development’s compliance before permits are issue (or certainly before occupancy is granted) , and clearly that was not done. I’d be embarrassed to admit that I had any part of this design. What a mess!
If there are multiple developers and if the municipal authorities have responsibility to make the overall design whole, then the responsible municipal authority needs to return to university to re-enroll in classes that address accessibility planning and design. If an independent civil engineering firm had single responsibility for the entire development, then the engineer of record needs to be replaced by someone who has a clue. Your comments are too kind.
Yet, so much time is spent planning for the circulation and storage of cars! Zoning laws are very specific about parking but largely silent on accommodations for pedestrians.
The pizza/salad is the most encouraging item in your post and would be the only reason that I’d ever go that this area of ST Charles to visit. Great pizza made with STL Provel cheese is hard to beat–there’s nothing like it anywhere, from my experience.
Again, this is among the very best developments of multiple buildings on a single site. The lack of connection beyond the site isn’t any worse than most in the region.
Those of you who drive most places fail to understand just how bad it really is.
I take it that you’re not a fan of Provel–or anything Provel-related! I’m sure it’s an acquired taste. Our family acquired it quickly when we first moved to STL from CA, where the pizza cheeses used are flat and the dough tastes like cardboard. I’ll take a slice of STL pizza made with Provel over any I’ve ever eaten elsewhere, including all over Italy where the pizza tastes no better than CA pizza. Whenever I’m in STL, I schedule a visit to Urzi’s Market on SW Blvd and purchase Provel cheese so I can bring it back to the kids, then they add it to frozen pizza bought from the markets.
You look at your photographs and you can see why St. Louis is in big trouble. Talk about hostile to humans, completely, and I mean completely designed for the auto. And if you are in a wheelchair it is ten times worse.
It is so unattractive for human use to be unthinkable. It’s no wonder Americans are so f**ked up in the head. The urban environment has all of the charm of a cell block.
This type of poor design is also being done to the city far too often when replacing historic buildings that once contributed to pedestrian activity. The new Quick Trip on Jefferson and Chouteau comes to mind. Although it is not as extreme as this example.
I have to agree that the pizza looks to be the best part and the salad doesn’t look bad either.
I really must take back my initial comment about the pizza shown in Steve’s photo. Without Provel, why not just go to Schnucks, buy a Jack’s Pizza, throw away the pizza and dine on the box!
AARP Livibility Index
The Livability Index scores neighborhoods and communities across the U.S. for the services and amenities that impact your life the most
Built St. Louis
historic architecture of St. Louis, Missouri – mourning the losses, celebrating the survivors.
Geo St. Louis
a guide to geospatial data about the City of St. Louis
“NOBODY SEEMED TO PLAN A WAY FOR MOTORISTS TO WALK FROM THEIR CARS TO THE BUILDINGS!”
This one always gets me. You’d think that developers/designers would at least think about pedestrians as they pertain to arriving in their cars, but no, they rarely do. This really demonstrates how little thought is given to any kind of pedestrian accommodation…despite the fact that we have ADA laws. It’s almost like the people who are responsible for these things have never been pedestrians themselves.
It’s hard to imagine that so many violations exist in that single development–one after another! The number of violations almost makes me question if a single developer is involved, or if there are multiple developers involved, each doing his own thing and ignoring the other developers’ plans. If that is actually the case, then the governing municipal authority has the responsibility to connect the dots of the overall accessibility design and to insist on each development’s compliance before permits are issue (or certainly before occupancy is granted) , and clearly that was not done. I’d be embarrassed to admit that I had any part of this design. What a mess!
This is one of the better multi[-building developments in the region. I wish more were half as good as this!
If there are multiple developers and if the municipal authorities have responsibility to make the overall design whole, then the responsible municipal authority needs to return to university to re-enroll in classes that address accessibility planning and design. If an independent civil engineering firm had single responsibility for the entire development, then the engineer of record needs to be replaced by someone who has a clue. Your comments are too kind.
Yet, so much time is spent planning for the circulation and storage of cars! Zoning laws are very specific about parking but largely silent on accommodations for pedestrians.
The pizza/salad is the most encouraging item in your post and would be the only reason that I’d ever go that this area of ST Charles to visit. Great pizza made with STL Provel cheese is hard to beat–there’s nothing like it anywhere, from my experience.
You’re right, there’s nothing else like it anywhere else . . . for good reason – other areas won’t put up with its inherent nastiness!
Again, this is among the very best developments of multiple buildings on a single site. The lack of connection beyond the site isn’t any worse than most in the region.
Those of you who drive most places fail to understand just how bad it really is.
I take it that you’re not a fan of Provel–or anything Provel-related! I’m sure it’s an acquired taste. Our family acquired it quickly when we first moved to STL from CA, where the pizza cheeses used are flat and the dough tastes like cardboard. I’ll take a slice of STL pizza made with Provel over any I’ve ever eaten elsewhere, including all over Italy where the pizza tastes no better than CA pizza. Whenever I’m in STL, I schedule a visit to Urzi’s Market on SW Blvd and purchase Provel cheese so I can bring it back to the kids, then they add it to frozen pizza bought from the markets.
This was real pizza, with real cheese — no provel.
You, too! Like JZ71, some day you too will acquire the taste.
You look at your photographs and you can see why St. Louis is in big trouble. Talk about hostile to humans, completely, and I mean completely designed for the auto. And if you are in a wheelchair it is ten times worse.
It is so unattractive for human use to be unthinkable. It’s no wonder Americans are so f**ked up in the head. The urban environment has all of the charm of a cell block.
This type of poor design is also being done to the city far too often when replacing historic buildings that once contributed to pedestrian activity. The new Quick Trip on Jefferson and Chouteau comes to mind. Although it is not as extreme as this example.
I have to agree that the pizza looks to be the best part and the salad doesn’t look bad either.
I really must take back my initial comment about the pizza shown in Steve’s photo. Without Provel, why not just go to Schnucks, buy a Jack’s Pizza, throw away the pizza and dine on the box!
But the salad does look good.