Home » Downtown »Parking »Planning & Design » Currently Reading:

Readers: New Building Should Replace Condemned Parking Garage

July 22, 2015 Downtown, Parking, Planning & Design 1 Comment
December 2014
December 2014

No surprise, but most who voted in the Sunday Poll favored an occupied building to replace a condemned parking garage downtown:

Q: The parking garage at Tucker & Locust, built in 1967, was condemned a few months ago. What should be the long-term outcome? (PICK UP TO 2)

  1. Raze for new building w/zero parking 22 [34.92%]
  2. Raze for new building w/some parking 21 [33.33%]
  3. Renovation of structure, reopen garage 6 [9.52%]
  4. Raze for new parking garage 5 [7.94%]
  5. Unsure/no opinion 3 [4.76%]
  6. Other: 3 [4.76%]
    1. Apartments, parking, ground level retail.
    2. Restaurant
    3. Traditional incremental urbanism
  7. Raze for surface parking lot 2 [3.17%]
  8. Nothing, leave as is 1 [1.59%]
  9. Raze for open space 0 [0%]

I was very happy nobody voted for “Raze for open space”, because we’ve got more open space than we need. I have to wonder about the person who voted that leaving a condemned parking garage is the best long-term outcome. Really!?!

Even in the short-term I’d oppose a surface parking lot. If built properly, it would likely stick around until fully depreciated — which isn’t short-term. We need to build on many of our existing surface lots to reduce holes in our urban fabric. A case could be made for a new parking garage on the site. At this point I’d give little chance the existing garage will be renovated — the repairs are just too costly.Without a doubt, a new building, with or without internal parking, is ideal.

The New Jersey-based entity that owns the condemned garage likely doesn’t care about what’s best for creating a more urban St. Louis, but I don’t care about their bottom line! In the Downtown Neighborhood Association’s Planning & Zoning Committee I’ll advocate for a position on this site that opposes just letting it sit or a surface parking lot, supports a building.

— Steve Patterson

 

Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. Josh Restivo says:

    My main concern is that we get some street-level retail in that property. If you look down Tucker in each direction you’ll see that a number of restaurants have popped up (Maurizio’s, The Docket, an asian place, Papa John’s). They’re a bit scattered right now and could use something to tie them together. That would be a great location for a sundry shop. If you put something like that on the first floor and some sort of specialized college above (arts/theater, trade, etc.), you’d bring more of the younger crowd downtown – it’s great having the SLU students down here – and improve the overall downtown living equation.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



FACEBOOK POSTS

UrbanReview ST LOUIS shared Humans of St. Louis's post. ... See MoreSee Less

“At the end of the day, there’s no legislation, there’s no list of demands, there’s no report that’s going to give the police an understanding that they have to stop killing us. We can change the courts, we can change these different things, but we need to change the culture of the police department and stop hiring certain officers. We can talk about training all day, but training doesn’t fix how you look at me as a man or a human being. No matter if you look at a report or you don’t, if you pass legislation or you don’t, if we have a list of demands or not, one thing we will get them to understand is that they will stop killing us no matter what that looks like.”

14 hours ago  ·  

Looking West from the EB MetroBus stop at Olive @ 16th. ... See MoreSee Less

21 hours ago  ·  

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe