Home » Ferguson »Politics/Policy »Sunday Poll » Currently Reading:

Half Of Readers: Ferguson’s Mayor Should Not Resign

March 25, 2015 Ferguson, Politics/Policy, Sunday Poll 2 Comments

Only one person selected “maybe” in the Sunday Poll — that person was me. I think Knowles‘ time to resign was 5-6 months ago — to fall on his sword — to clear out the old guard leadership so real change can begin. Now I hope the recall effort is successful.

Here are the poll results:

Q: Should Ferguson Mayor James Knowles resign?

  1. No 21 [50%]
  2. Yes 14 [33.33%]
  3. Unsure/No Opinion 6 [14.29%]
  4. Maybe 1 [2.38%]

Last Fall Knowles didn’t think problems existed in the Ferguson Police Department — his employer for 4 years, but the DOJ has shown otherwise. For Ferguson’s new political activists I think it’ll be much more rewarding if he’s recalled by voters than if he were to resign as others have. Conversely, if he survives the recall it’ll be a blow to those trying to bring change.

Ferguson has a Council-Manager form of government, the mayor’s annual salary is only $4,200.

— Steve Patterson

 

Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. JZ71 says:

    You are spot on with your analysis – “I think it’ll be much more rewarding if he’s recalled by voters than if he were to resign as others have [advocated]. Conversely, if he survives the recall it’ll be a blow to those trying to bring change.” However, given past voting patterns, where poor, minority, turnout has been insignificant, any recall effort would likely be unsuccessful.

    Bigger picture, where do we stop going after the “bad, old” leadership, individually? How does replacing someone who is essentially donating their time (the “mayor” is being “paid” less than $81 a week!) change the underlying culture? And if we continually demand the recall of our elected officials, how do we encourage “good, dedicated, right-thinking, quality” people to become involved in public service?

    The real “problem” is not individual(s), it’s structural. We have far too many small cities in north county, with small police departments, little commercial tax base, declining residential property values and no way, other than predatory policing, to fund their “city”. Ferguson is not unique – look at the bigger list – Pine Lawn, St. Ann and Normandy are all far worse “offenders” than Ferguson.

    North County’s current environment has evolved, reactively, it wasn’t created, consciously, to be oppressively racist. And north County and south County have evolved quite differently, with south county having far fewer small “cities”, a lot more unicorporated areas, more unified (County) policing and better schools, even though their underlying, mid-century architecture and urban design are quite similar.

    Given that evidence, the most likely “solution” to Ferguson’s “problems” won’t be replacing the “old guard, the best solution would be disincorporation . . .

    http://nextstl.com/2014/11/wealth-residents-flee-st-louis-county-munis-turn-fines-fees/
    http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/change-systems-or-people-beyond-ferguson-debates-way-forward
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/09/03/how-st-louis-county-missouri-profits-from-poverty/

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe