Home » Featured »Politics/Policy »St. Charles County »Taxes » Currently Reading:

I’m Opposed To Sales Tax For Zoo, Expand Zoo-Museum District And/Or Charge Admission

May 4, 2016 Featured, Politics/Policy, St. Charles County, Taxes 2 Comments
St. Louis Zoo
St. Louis Zoo

Two mornings a week admission to the Missouri Botanical Garden is free to those who live in St. Louis city & county — who pay property taxes to the Zoo-Museum District. The rest of the time admission is charged. The zoo, however, is free.

In 1972, the Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District – the Zoo Museum District – was formed. Through the District, the citizens and taxpayers of St. Louis City and County make possible the extraordinary quality of five institutions that are essential to life in St. Louis: the Zoo, Art Museum, Science Center, Botanical Garden and History Museum. (Zoo-Museum District)

Limiting the district to city and county made sense, that’s where the bulk of the population lived:

In 1970, the large majority of St. Louisans came together to save the cultural institutions. Today, less than half of the citizenry is left to carry the tax burden that fulfills the dream. There are actually 220,000 fewer residents today than there were in 1970 within the combined borders of the city and county, while the metropolitan area has grown by more than 400,000. (St. Louis Magazine, March 2009)

Yes, in 2009 the population of city & county is less than what it was at formation of the district.

St. Louis and St. Louis County residents already pay property taxes that raise more than $70 million a year for the region’s five cultural institutions. The zoo gets $20 million a year, as does the St. Louis Art Museum. The Missouri Botanical Garden, Missouri History Museum and St. Louis Science Center each receive about $10 million annually. (Post-Dispatch, October 2013)

From last month:

Zoo lobbyists are now working in Jefferson City to get legislation passed. The bills would allow county councils to put the tax on county ballots, perhaps as early as next spring.

But a variety of regional leaders have asked the zoo to consider an entry fee for nonresidents instead.

Charging St. Louis and St. Louis County residents with two taxes is unfair, said Ben Uchitelle, a former board member of the Zoo-Museum District, which collects and distributes the existing property tax. He’s also worried about accountability with a new tax. The Zoo-Museum District “carefully studies and holds accountable” the five regional institutions, including the zoo, that receive property tax dollars. Who would collect the new tax? Who would monitor its use? (Post-Dispatch)

In the non-scientofic Sunday Poll a majority supported a sales tax in five counties.

Q: The St. Louis Zoo may propose a 5-county 1/10th of a cent sales tax. Support or oppose?

  • Strongly support 10 [27.78%]
  • Support 8 [22.22%]
  • Somewhat support 2 [5.56%]
  • Neither support or oppose 0 [0%]
  • Somewhat oppose 3 [8.33%]
  • Oppose 5 [13.89%]
  • Strongly oppose 7 [19.44%]
  • Unsure/No Answer 1 [2.78%]

Support was 55.56 % to 41.66% for opposition. Count me among the opposition. We already have a good model for regional cooperation, we just need to expand it the way population has.

— Steve Patterson

 

Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. Mark-AL says:

    At the Columbus, Ohio, zoo, adults used to pay +/-$12.00 each and children paid +/-$9.00 each for admission. This was over 7 years ago. At San Diego’s zoo, adults used to pay $40.00 each and children paid $30.00 each for admission. I don’t know the current admission prices at those zoos, but you can be fairly sure there hasn’t been a price reduction. And the bummer is that in SD, rainout refunds aren’t offered if you’ve been in the zoo over 2 hours….but it seldom rains there anyway.
    In my opinion, STL’s zoo is far superior to both Columbus and San Diego’s zoos. St Louis’ zoo has fewer traditional cages and seems to have developed a greater number of natural habitats than at either the SD or Columbus zoo. At the Columbus zoo, reduced admission costs are offered to residents who live in certain counties (who I assume already support the zoo through real estate or other taxes.) And also in Columbus, residents of those counties are required to show their ID’s if they want the discount. Period. I guess if you’re opposed to the idea of having to present an ID, you’d be willing to pay the higher admission price. But there’s probably no reason why the STL zoo, the museums, etc have to be free. A nominal zoo admission fee, coupled with reasonably-priced hot dogs and soda and fewer fancy restaurants, would go a long distance toward addressing the financial challenges that the zoo faces and equitably share the operating costs among residents who benefit from the attractions. It’s interesting that there are at least 10 major museums in LA (from the Annenberg Space For Photography to the LA Museum for the Holocaust–and just about any other theme you might want to explore) that are absolutely free. But $10.00 parking would be a bargain, and you’d expect to pay upwards of $35.00 for 4 hours of parking, even more if you want all 4 tires on the car when you leave certain locations).

     
  2. Guest says:

    I rarely agree with you but I’m with you 100% on this one. It also bothers me that the zoo has money to spend from donors on fancy stuff but they want more taxpayer money for basic upkeep. I also think for a free zoo, we have a great zoo. Now the San Diego Zoo, has stuff that costs a lot more to maintain like its gondola and pandas that cost millions in fees to China every year. If the St. Louis Zoo wants more expensive features then it needs to be an admission zoo. If it wants to maintain its current infastructure and upkeep then the rest of the reigion needs to figure something out.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



FACEBOOK POSTS

Business at Tucker & Washington boarded their windows on Friday to prevent damage. ... See MoreSee Less

3 days ago  ·  

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe