Home » Popular Culture »Sunday Poll » Currently Reading:

St. Louis Question: Answer Depend On If You Attended High School Here

February 22, 2012 Popular Culture, Sunday Poll 2 Comments

The results from last week’s poll was interesting to me. The question asked is below with the answers presented in order from highest to lowest responses:

Q: The St. Louis Question: “Where did you go to school?” is?

  1. Just an ice breaker (I went to high school here) 40 [26.49%]
  2. Highly parochial (I went to high school here) 24 [15.89%]
  3. Annoying (I didn’t go to high school here) 22 [14.57%]
  4. Annoying (I went to high school here) 16 [10.6%]
  5. Other: 15 [9.93%]
  6. Just an ice breaker (I didn’t go to high school here) 13 [8.61%]
  7. Highly parochial (I didn’t go to high school here) 11 [7.28%]
  8. Great question (I did go to high school here) 10 [6.62%]
  9. Great question (I didn’t go to high school here) 0 [0%]

But it’s hard to draw any conclusions from the above as presented. Of the 151 responses, 136 answered with one of the predefined answers and the other 15 provided their own answer. I took the 136 that used the answers I provided and divided them based on if they went to high school here or not. Two-thirds of these did go to high school here, one third didn’t.

What we can see from the two pie charts is those of us that didn’t go to high school here (right) have very different thoughts on the question, with seventy-two percent of us selecting one of the two negative answers (annoying & highly parochial).  Conversely, fifty-five percent of those that did go to high school selected a positive answer (just an ice breaker & great question). No surprise, where you went to high school (here or not) influences your viewpoint.

The 15 “other” answers were:

  1. An ingrained part of growing up in STL. I find it annoying, but am unable to b
  2. a way to size someone up by class
  3. More than highly parochial, it is often a hierarchical query..
  4. It is an accepted, right or wrong, way of identifying you socio-economically. 
  5. Lived here 2 and half years, never heard it.
  6. used to discriminate and continue prejudice – another reason outsiders move away
  7. a salute to St. Louis 
  8. It’s part of the St. Louis culture – enjoy it, it makes you unique!
  9. a way to pigeonhole people by class. (I didn’t go to high school here). 
  10. Amusing. Especially from the perspective of one who was raised in the Metro-East 
  11. Who the hell cares? I’m in grad school! 
  12. An annoying question asked by dullards who have nothing more interesting to say 
  13. Symptomatic of a insular, backwards, anti-progressive community. 
  14. county – e, n w or south city east of grand west of grand TIRED TIRED TIRED 
  15. not an issue…..not worth discussing…..people make too much of the question

Among the above you get a full range of views.

The city and region needs more people to grow and prosper economically and those from the region aren’t pro-creating fast enough, too many Catholics using contraception.The region must attract more people from outside while not pushing away those raised here or attended college here. Last week the RFT had an article and brilliant flow chart on this topic.

– Steve Patterson

 

Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. Anonymous says:

     In the pie graphs, you should make all the positive responses (Great question/Just an icebreaker) in warm colors (red/yellow) and all the negative responses in cool colors (green/blue). Or the reverse, the important thing is that the overall balance is easy to distinguish. Right now it’s not. The legend at the bottom of the graph should be ordered accordingly.

     
  2. eric656 says:

     In the pie graphs, you should make all the positive responses (Great question/Just an icebreaker) in warm colors (red/yellow) and all the negative responses in cool colors (green/blue). Or the reverse, the important thing is that the overall balance is easy to distinguish. Right now it’s not. The legend at the bottom of the graph should be ordered accordingly.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe