Home » Downtown »Homeless » Currently Reading:

“Two Hours of Pushin’ Broom Buys an Eight by Twelve Four-Bit Room”

September 5, 2007 Downtown, Homeless 16 Comments

The times Roger Miller wrote about in his classic song, King of the Road, are long gone.

Trailers for sale or rent
Rooms to let…fifty cents.
No phone, no pool, no pets
I ain’t got no cigarettes
Ah, but..two hours of pushin’ broom
Buys an eight by twelve four-bit room
I’m a man of means by no means
King of the road.

Miller wrote King of the Road in 1965 at the age of 29. Using an online inflation calculator I found that $0.50 (aka four bits) in 1965 is equal to $3.14 in 2006 dollars. In 1965 you may not have been able to get a room for such a rate but the point is that today it is likely harder to find a cheap room for a couple hours of work. I checked St. Louis area room rates on some online sources and the best deal I could find is $45/night — if you are able to drive there. Ninety 360 bits plus tax. I’m sure cheaper places exist but you’ll likely need a credit card to check in.

Miller, born during the Great Depression, grew up in the next county over my father in very rural Western Oklahoma. My father was born seven years earlier in 1929. My dad rented a room briefly in the late 40s until he and my mom got married after she graduated from high school. These were the dust bowl days with families packing up and leaving for greener pastures further west. In these years and later you always had mostly single men that were drifters, vagabonds, and such — traveling from town to town working jobs here and there to get by.

Interestingly, one of the great names of St. Louis has just such a history: former St. Louis Mayor A.J. Cervantes. Cervantes, born on the city’s south side in 1920, became mayor in 1965 as Miller’s song was hitting the charts. Cervantes’ 1974 book “Mr. Mayor” talks about growing up in St. Louis, getting kicked out of St. Louis University High School and hitch hiking toward California “with a quarter and a few dimes in my pocket”. He continues:

Thumbing my way through the Dust Bowl offered few hardships. Motorists were usually friendly to a neatly dressed teen-age hitchhiker, and aside from suspicious farm wives in rural Arkansas, enough housewives who responded to my knock on the back door were ready to trade a meal for cutting the grass or some other odd job. I learned other tricks, too. A firehouse usually offered a place to sleep, and sometimes a meal as well. Firemen seemed always ready to interrupt a card game for a few words with a young wayfarer. And if all else failed I could always try the parish house next to the church.
Cervantes made it as far as Dallas but it was only a few months before he was back with his family on Juniata St. The next spring, however, he would venture out on his own again as he had had his “first taste of freedom.” Cervantes talks about hopping on freight cars and how they’d stop the train sometimes to toss off the free loaders — he describes learning to “ride the suspension rods underneath the cars – a dirty, precarious business. When I was sneaking rides over the Rockies in unheated boxcars, I used to wrap myself in newspapers to keep warm.

Cervantes, a 2-term Mayor of our city, had lived for a brief time as a homeless drifter trying to find his way. Eventually he did find his way to a mansion on a private street and to Room 200 at City Hall. A future mayor may not be among our homeless today but you just never really know who is out there.

Rooms to let…fifty cents.
No phone, no pool, no pets

In those days rooms were plentiful and available throughout every major and minor city. Ironically our efforts to provide better housing cleared many of these places located on skid row. The arch grounds, 40 city blocks cleared. East of Soulard, cleared. Blocks along Market near Union Station — all cleared. The free market naturally provided housing at many price ranges, including two bits. But by the time Miller’s song became popular many of the rooms were gone. But one type still existed, the rooming house.

Former mansions had been cut up into apartments of varying quality . Sometimes people would share a single bathroom and kitchen. Codes required fire escapes, many can still be seen today. Cities were naturally responding to market conditions, providing housing that people needed. Many a beautiful staircase, for example, were ripped out to be replaced with a wall to create separate units. The wealthier continued to move out of their once fashionable mansions to new digs on the edge — not really caring about what they left behind.

But in popular culture we could also see the old mansion divided up into apartments as something cool and modern. The perfect place for a single gal at age 30: Mary Richards. Mary Tyler Moore’s character lived in a former mansion turned apartments. Cloris Leachman played Moore’s landlady — at least the building was owner occupied, right? Some rooming houses still exist but they are very hard to find. Do you think any respectable associate producer for a local TV station would live in such an apartment? Getting permission to rehab an existing rooming house is not likely given today’s climate of people only wanting neighbors just like themselves.

IMG_2659.JPG Today few choices exist for those seeking the four-bit room. Downtown’s Mark Twain Hotel is one such choice, an old fashioned residential hotel (pictured at right). I called them earlier in the week to ask about rates, terms and availability. Rates start at $113/week for a room, $118/week for room with a bath (others have shared baths), a $50 deposit and $15 application fee for a background check — no felonies in the last 3 years and no drug convictions in the last 7 years. Doing the math you’ll see that someone could rent an apartment for what it takes to live at the Mark Twain but leasing an apartment usually requires a steady job, good credit, a 12-month lease and the ability to get utilities. For those on the edge of being homeless, the cheap residential hotel rented by the week is an excellent option to keep them out of the parks & shelters. When I called the Mark Twain all 238 rooms were full.

The new term for the residential hotel is the SRO — single room occupancy. The idea is to rent a room to someone at a very low rate. Hostels are similar although they usually serve a somewhat different clientele. Like the tiny cold water flat and rooms of the past, we’ve razed or otherwise done away with buildings that once served a useful need to a segment of the population. Other cities, working on real solutions to homelessness, are building new SROs. Having a place where someone working can put their few possessions and have a good night’s sleep is an important part of a city’s housing mix. St. Louis, like most cities, have unknowingly eliminated a housing option that would keep many homeless from being homeless.

We need to increase our housing options for the working poor. This doesn’t mean a hand out, just not forcing out viable choices via zoning or other methods. To me it is in our best interests to catch people with such housing on the way down — a far better way to solve the problem than pulling them up from park benches after several years on the streets. For more on this subject read a piece called A Place in the Sun written a few years ago by my friend Robert E. Lipscomb.

 

Currently there are "16 comments" on this Article:

  1. Greg says:

    Two quick comments —

    On priceline.com it’s possible to get rooms out near Westport for $23+taxes and fees (about $30 total). This is usually for a Homestead Suites type hotel (2*).

    One error in your math — $45 is 360 bits, not 90 bits. The Spanish 8 reales was approximately equal to the dollar in Colonial America and the coins were cut into 8 pieces (or bits) each worth 12.5 cents. Thus a quarter is two bits.

    Greg

    [SLP — Right you are, 360 bits!]  

     
  2. rb says:

    Good post Steve, I do wish cities had more housing like this – something affordable you could pick up on short notice and stay in for at least a few months. Of course now most people can get on the internet and find a room for rent in most cities pretty quickly, but not everyone has access to the internet and residential hotels are usually more centrally located. I lived in a residential hotel in downtown San Diego (the Southern Hotel) for three months, it was in a beautiful old building and was only $350/month with a shared bathroom. It was 1/2 block from their light rail line and within walking distance to numerous job opportunities. They’re a great option for travellers who want to stay in a city a bit longer than they might with a hostel, or as you point out for people who are borderline homeless.
    I honestly think, however, that governments at all levels try and discourage this type of housing, because it encourages a “rootless” type of lifestyle that isn’t necessarily friendly to the vision of economic growth/suburban family life that politicians like. To a large extent the prosperity of our economy requires folks to be tied to their jobs, mortgages, or at least leases. Not saying it’s a grand conspiracy or anything, just that the establishment obviously doesn’t want to encourage “vagabonding”.

     
  3. Southside Tim says:

    the only thing better then roger miller is a little tom t hall or johnny cash. how about glenn cambells gentle on my mind.

     
  4. Josh says:

    Hi Steve, an interesting post. It seems that you’re on the same page with Paul Groth, whose *Living Downtown* is a history of the very kinds of residential options you describe. Groth’s website is http://geography.berkeley.edu/PeopleHistory/faculty/P_Groth.html

    [SLP — Excellent resource — thanks!  I checked the SLU library and they have his book available so when I’ve got some time I will check it out.]

     
  5. Jim Zavist says:

    Unfortunately, in most cases, SRO’s fail at the convergence of an appreciating real estate market and current zoning regulations. Throw in a strong preference against “the kind of people they attract” among elected officials (and their constituents) and you find little opportunity or incentive to create any new ones. The only real solution is education, that even tony areas need affordable housing, if for no other reason than to provide a pool of minimum-wage employees . . .

    [SLP — Exactly.  Those lush lawns don’t take care of themselves, the office doesn’t just itself overnight, your dinner table in the restaurant isn’t cleared via magic.  Society has many low paying jobs and unless we allow (via zoning) housing options to fit everyone’s budgets we will continue to have people sleeping in parks.]

     
  6. Curtis says:

    I’m suddenly reminded of a Post-Dispatch article a year or so ago. It seemed the stores out in Chesterfield Valley were having trouble finding employees. People who were working out there were often coming from the city and spending 2 hours plus on buses to get there. Seems Chesterfield forgot that if they want their big homes and their local shopping, they need people who are willing to work in those stores and places for them to live too.

    It’s that added diversity that we have in the city that lured me here in the first place. I do agree with you, we could do much better and offer more alternatives. As I’ve said many times before, not everyone needs to go to college or even graduate HS for that matter. After all, I don’t care if the guy serving my Big Mac has a BA degree. It doesn’t do any good. We need people of all income levels and backgrounds to do all sorts of jobs. That requires the diversity in housing that many people don’t want to see, but they dont’ want to live without those people around either.

    Good post though, I always liked Roger Miller, he’s got a great last name!

    [SLP — In the academic world we call this a jobs spatial mismatch — that jobs and workers are not in the same area.  This is one of the many unintended consequences of our sprawling development patterns.  Potential workers look at what it takes to get to the job but are then criticized for not being better parents and supervising their kids after school, for example.  Living closer to the jobs are simply often not an option.]

     
  7. Joe Frank says:

    “not everyone needs to go to college or even graduate HS for that matter.”

    Well, I’d still say that a HS diploma is a pretty necessary requirement, or at least a GED. Many, many employers will not even consider people that don’t have that.

    The problem is that a diploma from the St. Louis Public Schools does not always indicate functional literacy.

    After all, you still want store clerks to count change accurately, right? Unfortunately, all too often that is not the case.

    I have read Cervantes’ bio a couple times. Interesting, but perhaps a bit exaggerated in places, I suspect.

     
  8. RV says:

    One curious fact: if you do a search on the Missouri Sex Offender Registry for zip code 63101, almost all the convicted offenders in that zip code are listed as living at 205 N. 9th St, a.k.a. the Mark Twain Hotel.

     
  9. RV says:

    Another anecdote– I remember being a curious high school kid in the ’90s and I used to go downtown with my friends to explore the big city. Once I went inside the Mark Twain to use the pay phone in the lobby (before it was renovated), and let me tell you, that place was right out of a ’70s New York movie. What a seedy, dirty, weird place that was! It smelled like urine, looked like shit and attracted some of the shadiest characters I had ever seen. The lobby was full of vagrants staring and yelling and smoking. It appears to look a little better now.

     
  10. Jim Zavist says:

    RV – would you rather have these offenders living with a fixed address or under a bridge, in a doorway or in a park by you?!

     
  11. Jim Zavist says:

    Labels can and are misleading. The “homeless” include the alcoholic Vietnam vet with mental problems who can’t live by society’s rules as well as the single mom who gets evicted when she loses one of her minimum-wage jobs. “Sex offenders” range from the drooling pedophile to the 18-year-old statutory rapist who got caught boinking Daddy’s 17-year-old little princess to the senile 70-year-old who did something stupid 50 years ago. Life is messy, nobody is perfect, and we need to figure out how to all live together. Not everyone can afford “middle-class” (or better) housing, and if options are not provided for those “at the bottom of the food chain”, the only option is the streets. Until we figure out how to make everyone “behave responsibly” (work hard, manage your money, defer gratification, no kids before 30), we will continue to have a need for housing in all price ranges. And until we accept diversity in all our communities and neighborhoods, the “affordable” options, especially at the lowest levels, will continue to be concentrated in the city . . .

     
  12. RV says:

    Jim Zavist– I didn’t express any opinion one way or the other about the Mark Twain being home to a number of sex offenders. I was just stating a fact.

     
  13. The City should rehab LRA homes for the homeless. We could do a pilot program. Take a few homes and some of the homeless who have skills. Give them a metropass. Maybe CMT could get involved and cover the cost. Then get them some entry level job with a City agency. Maybe a basic thing like cutting grass for Parks or doing some clerical work for another. Or maybe these guys could work for the LRA and help cut the grass of LRA buildings? Maybe they have former carpentry skills and they could even rehab some homes? There are solutions besides warehousing. Say, after they work for the City for a bit, the City could then refer them to a few local companies. Having the City as a reference along with an address besides Larry Rice could get their foot in the door. Homeless, currently, really don’t have any capacity to get a job since they have no address and probably questionable work history.

     
  14. partisan says:

    LRA buildings are hard to rehab. Their handsome brick facades hide years of neglect. They require total gut rehab, and the cost is substantial. How would you pay for it?

     
  15. Well, the LRA acquires new homes every year when they are not bought at the Sheriff’s sale. The LRA could rehab those new properties as they have not been weathered for 10 years or more. Sure, still expensive, but I think getting people out of Lucas Park and into the work force outweighs the cost of rehabbing LRA property. Plus, this would also reduce the number of properties the LRA owns. I am sure this could be done as a pilot program. Try two homes and maybe 6 people. See how it works?

     
  16. partisan says:

    The only reason LRA winds up with property after a tax sale is because every bottom fishing speculator in St. Louis took a pass on the “opportunity” to purchase the same property. And these are the same buildings we want the homeless to rehab? Hey, if you believe that, there are lots of excellent, late-night real estate investment shows on TV you might want to check out, and I hear every once in a while the hotels out by the airport offer 1-day seminars for those seeking to become rich in real estate.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe