Five years ago the world learned where Ferguson Missouri was located because a young black man was unnecessarily killed by a white police officer. We’ve seen it happen over and over since.
The Urban League built a new facility on the site of the nearby burned out QT, there also included a plaque. August 2017 photos below.
I have thoughts on proposed development in Ferguson & Dellwood, but I’ll share about those another day. Today I pause and think about Michael Brown and the too-long list of others who were unarmed but died in the hands of police. Hopefully in my lifetime I’ll witness the end of such discrimination.
The shooting of an unarmed African-American by a white Ferguson police officer was what opened the eyes to myself and other whites to what blacks had been saying for years. Two years ago this morning Michael Brown died on Canfield Drive.
In the Sunday Poll readers indicated conditions were “slightly better” than they were just before Mike Brown was shot a year earlier. Protests, rightly so, continue because conditions are only slightly better, rather than significantly better. And criminals use the protests as an opportunity to cause chaos.
Aside from the political & institutional, the physical isn’t much better. Most buildings burned are now just vacant sites. Only one was rebuilt.
The results:
Q: It’s been a year since Mike Brown was shot in Ferguson. How would you rate conditions today compared to just prior to his death?
Slightly better 16 [44.44%]
Unchanged 7 [19.44%]
Significantly worse 4 [11.11%]
Slightly worse 3 [8.33%]
TIE 3 [8.33%]
Worse
Other:
better in what way?
Tougher for the lawmakers; open season for the law breakers.
Same, but with more awareness of how bad conditions are
TIE 0 [0%]
Better
Significantly better
Unsure/No Answer
The current conditions are institutionalized and will take decades to change.
One year ago today Michael Brown was fatally shot by Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson. For today’s poll, a barometer of how things stand today compared to a year ago.
Please vote below, the answers are presented in random order. The “conditions” are left up to you to interpret.
First, let me apologize for the lack of posts Monday & Tuesday, our new fiber optic internet in our building went out last Saturday night. Our building’s IT provider didn’t get it fixed until after 4pm yesterday.
Sunday the poll software didn’t automatically close the poll at 8pm like I had set it to do. As a result, the poll stayed open until I noticed it Monday morning — closing it via my smartphone. That said, the percentages are roughly the same as they were at 8pm the night before:
Q: What should St. Louis do about the confederate memorial & street name in Forest Park?
Change the street name & remove the memorial from Forest Park 20 [28.17%]
TIE: 14 [19.72%]
Do nothing
Change the street name & supplement the memorial with additional information
Change the street name, leave the memorial in Forest Park 11 [15.49%]
Leave the street name, supplement the memorial with additional information 10 [14.08%]
TIE: 1 [1.41%]
Unsure/no answer
Other: Change the street name and move the memorial History Museum grounds
Leave the street name, remove the memorial from Forest Park 0 [0%]
The “do nothing” vote was less than 20%, conversely those who wanted change of some type was more than 78%. This is a great opportunity for a public process to brainstorm possible solutions that’ll help us reach a consensus. Last week I visited the confederate memorial to check it out, I’ve lived here almost 25 years and didn’t know about it until recently.
I think there should be a dialog, rather than a reactionary move. Further, I don’t think the monument should have been placed there to begin with.
City parks are meant to be places for all people to have a respite away from their busy lives, I think a park is no place for a confederate memorial, especially without the balance of a union memorial. That may sound “politically correct”. A civil rights garden could be created of the area, if the process is inclusive of all the players that civil rights – or lack there of – has affected. Whatever is done, I think it is important that it is not just a bandage, but true dialog.
As far as I can tell, there is no monument to the Union soldiers in St. Louis, nor a Civil Rights monument/memorial other than the “Naked Truth” sculpture at the Compton water tower. And that is really a monument to 3 German men, and not really for the cause of civil rights. Meaning there is not civil rights memorial significant to African-Americans.
The lack of other memorials in St. Louis, I think speaks volumes about the attitudes of the people of StL. Reinforcing the notion of white supremacy, everyday racism… It is the ongoing issues that were raised in Ferguson last summer, but have since fallen silent. Personally, I think focusing on removing flags or memorials skirts around the true issues and are only platitudes to quiet the cries of racism.
One thing that greatly bothers me about the monument, is the statement on it about the “battle to preserve the independence of the states…” The war was fought over slavery, as very clearly stated in the southern states on declarations. It was treason. The statement on the monument is revisionist history of the “lost cause”. That I find offensive and reprehensible. For that alone, I wish the monument was not there as it perpetuates erroneous “history”.
I would leave the language as is, but definitely have a panel next to it explaining that it is wrong, and why many people wanted to rewrite the history of the war.
It is a beautifully crafted monument by a notable sculptor.
I believe a civil rights garden could be sensitively incorporated into the park. There have been numerous additions to the park over the years.
I agree the memorial represents revisionist history and shouldn’t have been built. Let’s take a look…
Renaming, or even removing, Confederate Dr is a given — relatively easy. The memorial is a much more complicated issue. The words are offensive, but it is a good reminder of St. Louis’ race problem. I think we should discuss the creation of a civil rights garden that would educate visitors on events from our history, for example:
1911: restrictive covenants enacted, see 1948 Shelley v Kraemer Supreme Court decision
AARP Livibility Index
The Livability Index scores neighborhoods and communities across the U.S. for the services and amenities that impact your life the most
Built St. Louis
historic architecture of St. Louis, Missouri – mourning the losses, celebrating the survivors.
Geo St. Louis
a guide to geospatial data about the City of St. Louis