Home » Downtown »Planning & Design » Currently Reading:

Readers: Aquarium A Good Fit For Union Station

August 17, 2016 Downtown, Planning & Design 1 Comment

I’ve never been to an aquarium before, but I know they’re popular attractions.  We recently spent the day at Chicago’s Field Museum of Natural History, next to their Shedd Aquarium.  Shedd’s ticket prices range from $8/adult ($6/child) to $54.95/adult ($45.95/child). I assume most but the $37.95/28.95 “total experience” ticket, it allows you to see everything but you must wait in lines.

For years I’d heard about the World Aquarium, located within City Museum. Now it’s in Laclede’s Landing. Adult admission, for comparison, is only $6.

The new aquarium will be in addition to the existing:

St. Louis Aquarium will be a member of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, LHM said. The facility will employ marine biologists and aquarists to care for the creatures displayed and oversee water chemistry, animal nutrition, veterinary duties, education, staffing and safety.

The association, based in Silver Spring, Md., has more than 230 members. Among them is the Butterfly House, which opened in 1998 in Chesterfield and, since 2001, has been a division of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

The aquarium, expected to get a million visitors annually, will be a draw for school groups as well as an entertainment destination, LHM said. An 8,500-square-foot event space with the shark tank as a backdrop will be available for weddings, social gatherings and corporate parties. (Post-Dispatch)

As with zoos, I question the ethics of keeping wild animals in captivity for our amusement.

The former food court and retail spaces under the train shed had a decidedly mall feel, October 2011
The former food court and retail spaces under the train shed had a decidedly mall feel, October 2011

The results of the non-scientific Sunday Poll:

Q: Agree or disagree: An aquarium in the former shopping mall area is a good fit for Union Station

  • Strongly agree 13 [27.08%]
  • Agree 11 [22.92%]
  • Somewhat agree 7 [14.58%]
  • Neither agree or disagree 1 [2.08%]
  • Somewhat disagree 2 [4.17%]
  • Disagree 6 [12.5%]
  • Strongly disagree 6 [12.5%]
  • Unsure/No Answer 2 [4.17%]

I voted for “somewhat agree”, but it depends on the execution, admission price, etc. I’m more excited about the new hotel rooms to be built within the clock tower!

— Steve Patterson


Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. Todd Spangler says:

    I take the view that, in many cases, wild animals in zoos and aquariums do serve a role as ambassadors from the wild and can cultivate for many people a love and interest in wildlife that might not exist otherwise. My major interest is Australian animals, and in that country, some of the individual animals in captivity are actually orphaned marsupials rescued from the pouch after their mothers had been hit and killed by cars, such as Patrick the Wombat at Ballarat Wildlife Park. In the case of the aquarium for Union Station, it may perhaps fit in well with some of the other new attractions being planned and is likely to be a considerable improvement over the likes of the World Aquarium as it existed at City Museum, where it was essentially evicted from that venue because of the poor care being provided to its animal residents.


Comment on this Article: