8th Street Walkway Needed To Fill Missing 110’ Connectivity Gap
When cold water flats and tenements were cleared just north of downtown for St. Louis’ first high-rise public housing project, Cochran Gardens, several blocks of 8th Street were erased from the grid. Six decades later 8th Street was rebuilt* when the mixed-income Cambridge Heights apartments & townhouses replaced Cochran Gardens’ towers.
* 110 feet of 8th Street wasn’t replaced!
This short missing piece is a connectivity problem for those of us who live here. Later, when Cass Ave over I-44 (aka I-70) was raised as part of the Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge project 7th Street got disconnected from Cass Ave. So now neither 7th or 8th connect to Cass. Getting to/from the bus at Cass Ave & Broadway is likely the primary reason for needing access here, it would also be nice when we go to Shady Jack’s or walk/roll up Broadway.
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway01-500x375.jpg)
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway02-500x375.jpg)
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway03-500x375.jpg)
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway04-500x375.jpg)
Motorists use the alley south of Cass to get to/from Cass Ave, but pedestrians often walk though vacant land where 110 feet of 8th street should be. As you’ll see, putting in street, curbs, drainage, etc would be challenging & costly — all that’s needed is a 110 foot long sidewalk and a couple of curb ramps.
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway05-500x375.jpg)
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway06-500x375.jpg)
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway07-500x375.jpg)
This is needed because going between the neighborhood and Cass Ave is challenging as a pedestrian. I’ve thought so for the 3+ years I’ve lived here. I’ve also seen a woman at least 15 years my senior (so 70+) walking though the grass with a cane. The trail through the snow earlier this year was also a clue.
You might be thinking this land is vacant do it can be developed for more housing. Let’s take a look at the property lines.
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway08.725dickson-500x393.jpg)
My assumption is the 15 foot wide parcel known as 725 Dickson (map) is there to prevent anyone building over utilities, like sewer, under the old 8th Street. The end row house has a lot of extra land beyond their fence. Basically there’s more than enough width to create a generous pedestrian path. There are some obstacles near the alley.
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway09-500x375.jpg)
![](http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/8thstreetwalkway10-500x375.jpg)
There’s room to fit a 5′ wide walkway at the alley to then toward 8th & Dickson streets, we just need to figure out property lines, utilities, easements, etc. City mowers have a hard time during the summer keeping the back area cut — a private home owner would get a violation letter from the city for such conditions. The elevation is slightly higher at the alley than south at Dickson Street.
The need exists, much of the land is owned by the housing authority. Cost wouldn’t be that substantial. I’d love to see fruit trees planed on both sides of a walkway so the public can access free fruit.
— Steve Patterson