Home » Politics/Policy »St. Louis County »STL Region » Currently Reading:

Mayor Slay Calls for Local Police Control, City Rejoing County

April 22, 2009 Politics/Policy, St. Louis County, STL Region 34 Comments

Yesterday was inauguration day at city hall.  Half the Board of Aldermen were sworn into office as was the Comptroller (4th term) and Mayor (3rd term):

Mayor Slay at the podium after taking the oath of office

Here is the published text of Slay’s inaugural speech:

In preparation for these formal remarks, I read through some of the many words I’ve used as mayor. There have been a lot of them.

There is one phrase, a phrase that has occurred in speech after speech, which I have come to consider my hallmark. A thousand times – at neighborhood associations, ribbon-cuttings, ground-breakings, announcements, and bill signings — I have said: “ . . . and this could not have happened without the hard work of the people gathered in this room.” And a thousand times, that has been true.

It is especially true today. What has been accomplished over the past eight years has been done — together — by the people in this great room.

President Reed; Comptroller Green; members of my own family and of yours; honored guests; judges; aldermen; legislators; county-office officials; cabinet officers; department heads; all the hard-working men and women who work for the City of St. Louis in patrol cars, on the other end of phone lines, on hose lines, on garbage trucks, on ladders, at desks, and on the business ends of brooms and shovels – thank you for all you do for the people of the City of St. Louis.

An inauguration is as good a time as any to put some things behind us. And I mean to do just that. Given the challenges ahead of us, we cannot afford to keep fighting the old St. Louis fights. So, if you have ever, for any reason, thought my door was closed to you, try it again today. We have a lot of things to do in four years – and getting it all done is going to take every arm, every eye, every pen, and every heart that I can enlist.

The same is true for our region – and I mean both sides of the Mississippi River. We can no longer afford to compete against each other. We must combine our resources and talents to figure out solutions to regional issues as complex as race relations, poverty, transportation, and creating jobs in new industries – and to regional tasks as simple as writing smoke-free laws, sharing public services, and building bike paths.

The world is changing at a dizzying pace, accelerated by a brutal economy. The City and our region will be very different four years from now. They can be better – but not by accident. We have to make it happen. We must understand our strengths – and use them. We must notice our weaknesses – and correct them.

The national economy — and its aftershocks in Missouri and St. Louis – means that many more middle class residents will find themselves vulnerable – to layoffs, to furloughs, to foreclosures – and that already-vulnerable citizens will find themselves at ever-greater risk. Yet, necessity and opportunity have collided. This is fair notice to everyone: I plan to work with the elected officials and business community in the region to ensure that every federal dollar that crosses the Missouri border is spent where and when – and how — it was intended by President Obama and Congress.

I intend to make it the first business of my administration to refocus the attention and energy of government on doing the things that we do best: maintaining parks; providing recreation opportunities; fixing streets, sidewalks and alleys; expanding greenways and bike paths, and marking bike lanes; and using technology to improve communication with residents and enhance the delivery of services. I believe that there will probably be fewer city employees four years from now, but I know for certain that the ones who remain will be more productive, more committed, and better trained. And as City government looks for its correct size, it is imperative that we address – perhaps with state and federal help — the daunting task of fixing the employee pension systems.

There are things that City government has done well. We have won national and sometimes international attention for our prisoner re-entry program, our Problem Property Task Force, the rehabilitation of historic buildings, the renaissance of our Downtown, our efforts to end chronic homelessness, and our initiative to protect children from lead paint.

We will continue to challenge ourselves to do better.

To reinforce our efforts to deliver high-quality services to our neighborhoods I hope to enlist the services of local university graduates in a year or more of service in municipal government. If a mobilized group of young people can revolutionize communication, reshape traditional notions of consumption, and elect a president – they can certainly energize the IT Department, the Planning Agency, and the Citizens Service Bureau.

City government will have my mandate to reduce the amount of energy we consume, and the amount of pollution we produce.

We will do whatever is necessary — no matter whose toes we step on– to expand quality educational opportunities in the City so all children, regardless of income or neighborhood, can get the education they need to compete in a global economy.

We will, using sensible public incentives to attract private investment, continue to rebuild the historic neighborhoods that most need it. The local media will be covering north St. Louis the way they now cover downtown.

We will work together as a City to help the private sector to rebuild our economy and create good jobs in sustainable industries. That means we will have to innovate. It means we will have to retrain our workers. It means we will have to combine the governance of the region’s airports. It also may mean we will do more business with China than with St. Charles or Chicago. It means we will have to take advantage of our strengths, including our great universities, hospitals, and large number of beautiful, historic buildings.

Many of our government institutions and practices were put in place in a very different age, long before anyone considered Mexico and India as threats to our jobs. We will have to become more effective and efficient—and government must be collaborative. The City must reform its charter. The City, the inner suburbs, and outer suburbs must combine services. And, I strongly believe, that we must begin to lay the groundwork for the City of St. Louis to enter St. Louis County.

There are several representatives here today from Governor Jay Nixon’s office and several members of the Missouri General Assembly. Ladies and gentlemen from Jefferson City, it is time to let go of the past. The Civil War ended 144 years ago. In the age of YouTube, I-phones, and Twitter, it is time that St. Louis joined every other city in America and got its own police department. Governor Nixon, I promise we will not use it against the Confederate Army.

There are several representatives of MoDOT here. With a fairer share of the state transportation dollars that are now chiefly allocated to roads, bridges, and highways, the St. Louis region could fund affordable, clean, reliable, useful, and safe public transportation that let workers reach their jobs without burning gallons of gasoline. And we could finally break the “one-to-a-car, surround-it-with-surface-parking” construction habits that waste valuable land and blight landscapes. If MoDOT will not play fair now, it cannot expect us to support its plans in the future – and we will also work with others in the region to find ways to help ourselves.

There are representatives of MSD here today. We will work with them to modernize our sewer systems—not only to get the Environmental Protection Agency off our backs, but also because it will make our city more sustainable.

And in everything we do, we will, wherever possible, use St. Louis companies and St. Louis workers.

All of these changes — to help those struggling in this economy, to reorganize city and regional government, to find better educations for our children, to reinvest in our neighborhoods, to improve our quality of life, to create jobs in new industries, to engage young college graduates, to build contemporary infrastructure — will require that we talk to each other more often, more directly, and in different ways.

The way we share information has changed. Newspapers and radio stations are struggling for audiences. Television has been fragmented into hundreds of channels and time-shifted by DVR and the Internet. As a result, it is almost impossible to develop a consensus on any answer, except “no.”

So, we will have to learn new ways of communicating, of organizing.

Community meetings will take place in neighborhood list serves and web sites. Community meetings will be on-line forums, as well as in person meetings. Every part of municipal life — signing up for summer recreation, Operation Brightside blitzs, street closings/repairs, paying a tax bill, dealing with a bad neighbor, recycling, getting involved in a mentoring program, finding job counseling – must be available on-line. There is no reason why getting a building permit should require a trip to City Hall – or be much more difficult than buying a book on Amazon.

The past eight years have been an awakening—we have shown what we can accomplish if we dream great dreams and if we work together to make them reality. The next four years will see just how far we can really go.

It is time to get to work on the future. It is time to set aside our differences and come together around a common agenda.

I am excited to be your mayor. I am proud of our City. I am optimistic about our future. I am ready to get back to work.

Thank you, and God bless St. Louis.

Still here?  That is a lot to take in.  Let’s go in order looking at selected text:

We can no longer afford to compete against each other. We must combine our resources and talents to figure out solutions to regional issues as complex as race relations, poverty, transportation, and creating jobs in new industries – and to regional tasks as simple as writing smoke-free laws, sharing public services, and building bike paths.

True, we can’t continue competing with each other.  Moving employers around the region doesn’t help the region.  I like that he specifically mentions smoke-free laws.

Many of our government institutions and practices were put in place in a very different age, long before anyone considered Mexico and India as threats to our jobs. We will have to become more effective and efficient—and government must be collaborative. The City must reform its charter. The City, the inner suburbs, and outer suburbs must combine services. And, I strongly believe, that we must begin to lay the groundwork for the City of St. Louis to enter St. Louis County.

Collaborative government?  Yes.  Reform the city charter?  Yes.  Combine services?  Yes.  Reverse the 1876 split from the county?  Not until the 90+ municipalities in St. Louis County get consolidated by at least half.  Both charter reform & rejoining the county would involve eliminating a number of elected offices.  If they remained they’d no longer be elected positions.  Sheriff, Recorder of Deeds, Circuit Clerk, Circuit Attorney, Collector of Revenue, License Collector, Treasurer, Public Administrator and Comptroller are either duplicates of existing offices in St. Louis County or are offices which could be appointed by the Mayor and approved by the Board of Aldermen.

My poll last week was on this very topic.  Only 30% of you took the term “merge” the city & county meant just rejoining the county.  Sixty percent took it to mean a consolidated government form.  Mayor Slay, however, said “rejoin” not “merge.”

There are several representatives here today from Governor Jay Nixon’s office and several members of the Missouri General Assembly. Ladies and gentlemen from Jefferson City, it is time to let go of the past. The Civil War ended 144 years ago. In the age of YouTube, I-phones, and Twitter, it is time that St. Louis joined every other city in America and got its own police department. Governor Nixon, I promise we will not use it against the Confederate Army.

You’ve got to watch those confederates.  We can always tow their cars and sell their event tickets.  Seriously, we should have control of our own police force — for better or worse.

Community meetings will take place in neighborhood list serves and web sites. Community meetings will be on-line forums, as well as in person meetings. Every part of municipal life — signing up for summer recreation, Operation Brightside blitzs, street closings/repairs, paying a tax bill, dealing with a bad neighbor, recycling, getting involved in a mentoring program, finding job counseling – must be available on-line. There is no reason why getting a building permit should require a trip to City Hall – or be much more difficult than buying a book on Amazon.

Obviously I’m a huge fan of the digital lifestyle but I don’t ever see the internet displacing the value of face-to-face meetings.  I do see huge value in having every single municipal form online as an editable PDF document.  We are such a long way from that now.  Most forms are not even in a non-editable PDF format.  I got one form recently as a Word document.  Our city website is stuck in the 1990s so I agree we need a digital overhaul.  Of course with so many elected officials the Mayor doesn’t have oversight in many aspects of city government.

Can Slay make these changes?  It is a tall order.  But we must dig in.  I say a first step is to eliminate partisan elections for city offices — that would simplify elections every two years.  I talked with one Alderman today about reducing the total number.  This Alderman was complaining about the lack of support staff to succeed.  Well, eliminate 14 Aldermen and suddenly you’ve got nearly half a million dollars a year available for better aldermanic pay and/or increased support staff.

This last item was tried in November 2004 as one of four charter reform measures.  Conveniently a classmate made a presentation on the 2004 charter measures last night.  He was one of the original citizen stakeholders that proposed the changes.  A more seasoned political staff took over and poorly pushed four measures on the same ballot.

Proposition D called for a gradual reduction of the Board of Aldermen to 15 with the presiding officer being selected from within the Board rather than via a city0wide vote as we currently do with the President of the Board of Aldermen.  Not sure 15 is the right number but conceptually I agree.

Being the mayor that led the city to successfully change its charter would be an outstanding legacy.  But can he do it?

Follow UrbanReviewSTL on Twitter

 

Currently there are "34 comments" on this Article:

  1. Jimmy Z says:

    Mostly I agree with the mayor’s agenda – the trick will be moving from goals to actual, real implementation. It’s a good mix of pragmatic redevelopment ideas combined with moving the city and the region into the 21st century. The one statement, however, that carried the most political baggage and/or mixed messages, at least in my mind, is “We will, using sensible public incentives to attract private investment, continue to rebuild the historic neighborhoods that most need it. The local media will be covering north St. Louis the way they now cover downtown.”

    The local media isn’t always kind about downtown, and in many cases, rightly so. BPV is still a dream. Crime reports continue to scare suburbanites. Metro rarely gets much good press. So if they’ll “be covering north St. Louis the way they now cover downtown”, what does that really mean? Will other, more-stable neighborhoods be neglected? Just because they don’t “need it”? Is McKee getting ready for some big announcement? Using “using sensible public incentives to attract private investment”? I think we all agree that the north side needs help – it just can’t be accomplished at the expense of the rest of the city. There needs to be balance. I’m a big believer in “a rising tide raises all boats”. We need to both “rebuild” neighborhoods that are beyond salvaging AND we need to continue to reinvest in neighborhoods that are still “solid”.

     
  2. Jimmy Z says:

    We’re not as bad off as Flint, Michigan, but we may also need to consider some of their “solutions”, either in parts of the city and/or in our surrounding inner-ring suburbs: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/business/22flint.html?_r=1

     
  3. Chris says:

    What Flint is doing is what I call “undertaker” urban planning. Don’t bother trying to resuscitate–just bury it and move on. What a horrible idea, and not surprisingly, Flint is still failing. All past St. Louis promotional literature boasted of St. Louis’s growth; can we seriously believe that we will encourage new business by bragging about our regression??

     
  4. john says:

    Earth Day, so come back to earth. Great and needed objectives, agree much with Slay, but the reality is the region has been created and managed by a perverse set of incentives. We are divided by design and these designs (too many small minded elected leaders) guarantee that we haven’t hit bottom yet.
    – –
    Virtually every major infrastructure expenditure in the last 15 years have exacerbated these perverse incentives. MetroLink has become MetroStink (that cost us over $650 million), Lambert is no longer an international hub and in many ways not even considered a regional hub anymore (that cost us over $1 billion), Page Extension built to favor not the City or StL County but St Chuck (another $300 million largely wasted), the New 64 is designed to enhance unsustainable choices (over $550 million), etc. etc. etc. Local leaders brag about these failures?
    – –
    But these poorly spent infrastructure expenditures don’t come close to addressing the larger problems. Communities divided by design have worked for decades to create favorable advantages that many won’t want to sacrifice anytime soon. The Clayton-Richmond Heights merger study clearly demonstrated that the odds of realigning communities are virtually impossible. In addition, the business community has been bailing out of this region for over two decades and last year showed that even our largest brewer will no longer be governed locally.
    – –
    Combining services sounds good but as illustrated before, the promises greatly exceed reality. Until a majority of these leaders and citizens realize that their asset values, lifestyles, and everyday joys of life are clearly linked, progress is unlikely. Small town minded alderman and municipal council members will fight against these greatly needed changes.

     
  5. Aragornman says:

    What about Metro? Those of us who take public transit are stuck riding buses that are jammed packed and turn away passengers. The agency is cutting hundreds of jobs and there is no end in sight. Mayor Slay, this should have been identified as a major issue/priority in your speech.

     
  6. dumb me says:

    There’s no pleasing some. For years, many have been critical about the lack of attention on city neighborhoods with all the glory/resources going to downtown. The northside being the least among equals.

    Now the mayor promises heightened attention to the northside, and the parochial knives come out. JZ, what is the possible downside of having more positive press about north city?

     
  7. I think we all agree that the north side needs help – it just can’t be accomplished at the expense of the rest of the city. There needs to be balance. I’m a big believer in “a rising tide raises all boats”. We need to both “rebuild” neighborhoods that are beyond salvaging AND we need to continue to reinvest in neighborhoods that are still “solid”.

    This is a serious misinterpretation of the mayor’s one-sentence comment.

     
  8. mark groth says:

    Where was County Exec. Charlie Dooley?

     
  9. publiceye says:

    “Mayor Slay, this should have been identified as a major issue/priority in your speech.”

    Like this?

    There are several representatives of MoDOT here. With a fairer share of the state transportation dollars that are now chiefly allocated to roads, bridges, and highways, the St. Louis region could fund affordable, clean, reliable, useful, and safe public transportation that let workers reach their jobs without burning gallons of gasoline. And we could finally break the “one-to-a-car, surround-it-with-surface-parking” construction habits that waste valuable land and blight landscapes. If MoDOT will not play fair now, it cannot expect us to support its plans in the future – and we will also work with others in the region to find ways to help ourselves.

     
  10. Jimmy Z says:

    It boils down to one’s definition of “rebuild”. Is it the Flint/McKee/Urban Renewal model, where entire neighborhoods are leveled and rebuilt from the ground up? Or is it the urbanist ideal, with sensitive infill projects complementing what’s left? I guess that I take things literally and I’m more than just a bit cynical – without details, I expect the worst, and in my world, rebuilding means starting from scratch.

    And yes, it is parochial, and no different than the Mayor putting pressure on MoDOT to respect where the money comes from – who gets to decide the neighborhoods “that most need it”? The Mayor? The Board of Aldermen? The economic-development “experts”? This is St. Louis. Politics WILL play a major role. I repeat, we need to both “rebuild” (or better yet, reinvest in) the neighborhoods that are suffering serious decay AND we need to continue to reinvest in our neighborhoods that are still “solid”. It’s not an either-or scenario – if the south side ends up being “neglected” or suffering from the same economic and social displacement that many parts of the north side have experienced over the past fifty years, NOTHING will be gained. We need to do both, protect and reinvest in neighborhoods that are doing well AND we need to support the mayor’s efforts to leverage public investment with private investment in areas where it’s appropriate. Unfortunately, much of the recent public investment in distressed neighborhoods has focused on streetscape improvements that do little to address the core issues of crime, schools and taxation . . .

     
  11. Tim says:

    “Can’t afford to compete”…no, we can’t afford to NOT compete. You don’t like the trash pick up in St. John…move….don’t like the police in Bel-Nor…move….and I don’t see the reason for attaching the anvil that is the city to the county. The only way I’m for reversing the city/county situation is if the city government is disbanded and it becomes unincorporated St. Louis County.

     
  12. dumb me says:

    Tim – keep moving alright…all the way to Bald Noster, Missouri. Don’t let the grass grow under your feet, and by gosh never work to improve things where you are, that grass is always greener in the next county down the road.

     
  13. Charlie says:

    The Mayor touched upon a subject dear to my heart these past 30 years or so….the possible merger of the city and the county.

    Fraught with opposition for all concerned. Small city mayors and aldermen don’t want to give up the power. Smallville’s chief of police doesn’t want to end up a lieutenant in a larger force; same for the fire chief. The parks departments? And, oh my god, the school systems? Who wants that burden?

    It is my perception that, in the end, these and all other concerns will wilt in the public’s desire for merger. People are tired of this. I think that if the voters of St. Louis vote to amend the city charter to allow the borders to expand, one by one the surrounding cities will vote to merge. I believe it is inevitable.

    What it will take is a strong campaign to highlight the plusses and rebut the naysayers. I haven’t agreed with everything the Mayor has done, but on this subject, he’s right on.

     
  14. I remember my Grandfather giving speeches around St. Louis every night in favor of the Borough Plan to unify St. Louis back in the 60’s. What year would that have been? It lost in both the City and the County.

     
  15. toby weiss says:

    Slay’s comment about positive press for the North Side is merely him acknowledging that he’s aware of the criticisms about his LACK in that area. And the phrase “positive press” is far more revealing about the administration’s real concern: media image spin. It’s all politics as usual.

    Also, his speech feels more like a set-up for what the NEXT mayor will be expected to tackle.

     
  16. Jimmy Z says:

    A historic neighborhood was “rebuilt” when Pruitt-Igoe was constructed. If the rumors are true and McKee wants to build an industrial park in north St. Louis, one or more historic neighborhoods will be “rebuilt”, to their detriment in many residents’ eyes. My point is to be careful what you ask for and embrace – words have both meaning and power.

    And when it comes to the press, rarely do they report on the many small incremental successes, the ones that are the core of any successful neighborhood, city or region – they like to cover the “big” news, the big projects that have flashy renderings and promise many new jobs (see BPVor Sunset Hills). When was the last time you saw a report on the amazing turnaround that’s happening in the Grove, along Manchester, or about the successful infill housing that’s happening around Gaslight Square? Or even some good press about the stable neighborhoods that don’t have nightly police calls? It’s the old cliche, “if it bleeds, it leads”, and for too many people, it’s their basic perception of the city. Hopefully the mayor is successful in redirecting the press, to focus on successes everywhere in St. Louis.

     
  17. samizdat says:

    “…I promise I will not use [the MSTLPD] against the Confederate Army.” That is actually very funny. Too bad the rural Sons and Daughters of the Confederacy MO Legislators don’t get it. And while we’re talking about pie-in-the-sky (well, some of his thoughts, though laudable, will be difficult to bring to fruition), why not petition the feds for about, oh, I don’t know, whaddya think a fully-inclusive restoration of City Hall would cost? 50 millionUSD? 80? 100? The usual stuff; a complete and thorough repointing of brick and stone exterior joints, and a professional and appropriate cleaning of said exterior, etc., complete overhaul of HVAC systems, perhaps incorporating ground-source geothermal for heating and cooling, solar water heating, complete electrical and plumbing updating/replacement, solar PV built over the City Hall parking lots. And, of course, a thorough and complete restoration of the interior, including all original murals and paint schemes, plaster moulding and woodwork. Hey, a fella can dream, can’t he?

     
  18. Adam says:

    “Tim – keep moving alright…all the way to Bald Noster, Missouri. Don’t let the grass grow under your feet, and by gosh never work to improve things where you are, that grass is always greener in the next county down the road.”

    thank you.

    also, Tim, keep expecting infrastructure to follow you every time you move so you can still enjoy all the amenities associated with urban living without the hassle of considering how your actions effect the rest of the world.

     
  19. Adam says:

    ^^ don’t forget restoration of the central spire and the two smaller ones to either side – removed in the 1930s due to corrosion and never replaced. classy.

     
  20. Joe Borough says:

    Bill Hannegan, the Borough Plan was in 1962. Its a shame it was defeated. I’d love to see any literature or anything documenting the case made and the plan exactly. I’m continuing to look for it.

     
  21. studs lonigan says:

    What is the mayor’s specific “lack” on the north side? What administrative services and functions does he perform in other neighborhoods that he refuses to discharge north of Delmar?

    (Note: Demoting Sherman George and/or firing Percy Green do not count)

    Abandonment and decay in north St. Louis predate Slay’s existence on the planet. More new housing (affordable, market rate and combined) has been developed in north St. Louis neighborhoods during Slay’s tenure than during decades prior to it. If one does not believe he should personally get the credit for that, then he should not be taken to task for what went down there starting more than fifty years before.

     
  22. Jimmy Z says:

    Classic headline du jour about the city, complete with photo, from the Post-Dispatch website: “St. Louis man shot and killed pit bull” . . .

     
  23. john says:

    StL definition of success: “Over the last 15 years, the commitment of more than $2.5 billion in public money for local development incentives has not resulted in real economic growth… About 80% of that amount was used to promote retail development” (EWGC). The spent funds were provided via TIFs, TDDs and SPDs. Now there are the buried but real stories of the last 15 years along with the failures in infrastructure design. How’s the region planning to progress when the vast majority of public funds-assets failed to result “in real economic growth”? The hole is getting deeper.

     
  24. Dave says:

    Can the city pass some sort of law that would not allow county addresses to use St. Louis as their city address so long as the city is not part of the county? I love how many companies here complain about the city and earnings tax, locate or relocate to the suburbs, but then continue to use St. Louis as the city on their mailings and anything that contains their address! As far as I’m concerned, if they refuse to allow the city to be part of STL county, then we shouldn’t allow STL county residences and businesses to use St. Louis as their city on mailings and communications.

     
  25. Todd says:

    Dave,

    Probably not. What address a business decides to use is a matter between the business and the Postal Service. Also, I’m not sure what authority the city of St. Louis would have to enforce such a law against a company not within its jurisdiction, not to mention the possible First Amendment problems of passing such a law.

     
  26. Todd says:

    I’m new to MO and STL politics. How on earth did the state governor end up being in charge of selecting the Commissioners for a city’s police department? Is this only occur in St. Louis, or is this the case for every Missouri city? Bizarre.

     
  27. Jimmy Z says:

    Todd – it’s only in St. Louis, and goes back to the civil war, when there was a very real fear that the city police would become allied with one side of the war (I forget which side), so the state took control . . .

     
  28. Todd says:

    Jimmy Z,

    Thanks for filling me in on that interesting history. The Mayor’s joke now makes sense (and was rather witty). Clearly this policy is an anachronism that should be done away with.

     
  29. Jimmy Z says:

    The “official” history: http://www.slmpd.org/history/index.htm

    More detail: http://stlouiscore.com/?p=642

     
  30. john says:

    Wise to put the “official” in context. The political-economic battles in booming StL in the 1850s led to some large philosophical battles. One has to wonder how these battles led to the decision that placed control of this important political-economic-social tool in the hands of the state.
    – –
    The appointed provisional Governor, Hamilton Gamble, declared in 1861, “No countenance will be afforded to any scheme or to any conduct calculated in any degree to interfere with the institution of slaver existing in the State. To the very utmost extent of Executive power, that institution will be protected.” Contrary to popular belief, even the loyal Union government of Missouri was staunchly pro-slavery.
    – –
    “Though slavery is thought, by some, to be mild in Missouri, when compared with the cotton, sugar and rice growing states, yet no part of our slave-holding country is more noted for the barbarity of its inhabitants than St. Louis.” (a former slave). Read more:
    http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/county/stlouis/slavery.htm

     
  31. Eric says:

    Holy Cow –

    Slay gives a speech and I agree with almost all of it – who would’ve ever thought?!?! Now let’s just hope he shows some follow-through on these proposals and reminds the suburbs that without the city, they don’t exist. This isn’t the Chesterfield metropolitan area, after all.

    Regional solutions to regional issues promise to make our metro area more equal, more socially just, more competitive, more efficient, and all around a better place to live. Forward thinking businesses recognize that they need good public education systems, good transit systems, and good healthcare systems in order to draw upon an educated workforce.

    Unfortunately, at the same time this speech was going on, the state legislators were deciding to pander to voters and give back pocket change rebate checks instead of thinking long term about infrastructure spending, job creation, and social welfare.

     
  32. publiceye says:

    “Todd – it’s only in St. Louis”

    Kansas City regained control of its police department in the early 1930’s, but lost it again in the late 30’s.

     
  33. Zundo says:

    The Borough Plan of 1962

    My personal summary comes from the book, “St.Louis Plans: The Ideal and the Real St.Louis”

    This plan stemmed from the 1959 attempt to create the Metropolitan St. Louis District. It attempted to use a constitutional amendment to consolidate the city and county. All municipalities were to be consolidated. The only district, municipality or service excluded from consolidation were the school districts. Under this plan the city and county would be unified, fulfilling both city and county government functions. The “Municipal County” was to be divided up into 22 boroughs, eight in the city, seven in the county and seven on the city/county border. Strong opposition for the “merger” was seen throughout the state, county and city.

    Other attempts at major consolidation/mergers occurred in 1926, 1959, 1987 and 1990.

    In 1987, there was an effort to consolidate St. Louis County to 37 municipalities.

    I really hope that Slay is able to champion a “rejoin” successfully. St. Louis really needs to become unified, before it can reach its potential. And there is plenty of potential!

    The more I talk to people about this, the more it seems people are on board, after a little education of course.

     
  34. ed hardy clothing says:

    We'r ed hardy outlet one of the most profession
    of the coolest and latest ed hardy apparel, such as
    ed hardy tee ,ed hardy bags,
    ed hardy bathing suits, ed hardy shoes,
    ed hardy board shorts , don ed hardyt,ed hardy tank tops, ed hardy for women,
    ed hardy swimwearand more,
    ed hardy clothing. We offers a wide selection of fashion
    cheap ed hardyproducts. Welcome to our shop or just enjoy browsing through our stunning collection available wholesale ed hardy in our shop.

    our goal is to delight you with our distinctive collection of mindful ed hardy products while providing value and excellent service. Our goal is 100% customer satisfaction and we offer only 100% satisfacted service and ed hardy products. Please feel free to contact us at any time; we are committed to your 100% customer satisfaction. If you're looking for the best service and best selection, stay right where you are and continue shopping at here is your best online choice for the reasonable prices. So why not buy your ed hardy now, I am sure they we won’t let you down.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe