$1 Billion Mississippi River Bridge – The Numbers Just Don’t Add Up

Tuesday evening last week engineers revealed a new proposal for the Mississippi River Bridge. As expected, it is less costly and far less intrusive into the city compared to the old bridge. At first glance it looks fine. But when you dig below the surface the new design falls short of acceptable in an urban environment. Dig some more and the conclusion we need the bridge is questionable at best.

If you haven’t seen the previous design take a look at a prior post. Before I get into the question of having the bridge at all, let’s look at the revised design.

mrb1.jpg

Again, the new design is far better than the catastrophic design previously proposed. Keep in mind the original concept many years ago was to make a highway loop around the West edge of downtown and connect with I-64/Hwy 40 just to the West of Union Station. Later this was scaled back as the 22nd Street Parkway but lofts and restaurants in the path of the parkway and lack of funds have killed the concept. But the engineers for the new bridge had continued to act as though the parkway was going to happen. In prior bridge concepts they had a massive hole and roadway stretching across the North edge of downtown that would dump cars onto Washington Avenue. Lack of money, not a richness of good sense, prompted the engineers to reconsider the Missouri interchange for the bridge.

Now, instead of dumping cars onto Washington Avenue they are being dumped onto Cass Avenue. The shortened on/off ramps are still being called “parkway” by the engineers simply because of all the open grass land around the them. Open grass land that comes from razing buildings and erasing the street grid. Long high-speed on/off ramps in an area where buildings and streets used to exist but now has some green grass is not a parkway, it is a mistake.

With nearly every downtown building being renovated as lofts and renewed interest in Old North St. Louis through their new in-fill houses we have a very unique opportunity to mend the city. Between downtown and Old North much has been lost and changed. But the street grid is mostly intact as are many of the buildings that make up a starting point for filling in the gaps between these two points. If done successfully someone could enjoy a nice walk from downtown to Crown Candy Kitchen. Filling in these blocks with new loft-like buildings, rowhouses and other building types we could create an even stronger residential base to support the growing number of downtown businesses. Strengthening our neighborhoods and seamlessly connecting them together should be a high priority for revitalizing the city. The new bridge design will make such connections visually challenging and literally difficult by foot, bicycle and even by car if you don’t know which streets are closed.

The revised design calls for the ramps to dump onto Cass Avenue between 10th and 11th Streets. Engineers have four lanes of traffic exiting the bridge at Cass. Two lanes turn left and two right. The assumption is many of the drivers that turn left will make an immediate right to take 10th Street into the central business district (CBD). 10th Street is currently a one-way street heading south, serving as a speedy exit from the current I-70. During the morning rush the street is crowded with folks just passing through. After 9am the street is desolate unless we have some sort of sporting event going on. The street is not there to serve the residents and to build upon but simply a pass through. Ninth Street is the opposite. No, it is not a lively street 24/7 but simply a Northbound version of 10th, a pass through on the way to somewhere else.



… Continue Reading

 

Busch Stadium: Out With the Old, In With the New

busch1.jpg

The latest spectator sport in St. Louis is the demolition of the 1960s Busch Stadium designed by Edward Durell Stone. Every day you can see people lining 8th Street taking pictures and watching the demolition. To maintain their tight schedule demolition continues into the evening hours as well.

Friday night when I passed by on my scooter I got to see an amazing sight. The wrecking ball just hit a large section of the old stadium and a falling exterior column took out a scissor lift on the site. Ouch, expensive mistake.

Many are upset to see the modern stadium go in favor of the new retro stadium. In a post last month I listed buildings I’d raze before the old Busch. The circular form of the old stadium was one of its best features. The arches were unique and looked great at night. Other than that, I was not so impressed.

The old stadium was not a good urban neighbor. The harsh forms & materials did not invite anyone to look and touch. The building was not pedestrian friendly. The arches, the one redeeming feature, were too far removed from the sidewalk to compensate for the lack of interest otherwise presented to the outsider. The design never mattered much on game day because of all the people, it is those non-game days when empty that it took life away from the area. Sorry all you folks that love the old stadium, I’m not going to miss it.

But what about the new stadium?

Well, I’m over the whole red brick with black metal retro stadium look exemplified by the new Busch and countless other stadiums across the country built in the last 10 years. The whole notion of building something new trying to pass itself off as being from a century earlier makes me noxious nauseous. That having been said, I think the new stadium will accomplish a number of positive things the old stadium could not.

First, by constructing the new stadium closer to the highway it leaves room downtown for the “ballpark village,” a mixed-use development. This should help repair part of downtown torn apart in the 60’s. The new Busch is still bigger than a city block and therefore messes with the street grid. However, it recognizes the grid. Entrances on 8th Street and Broadway are aligned with Spruce, a subtle but important design element.

The new design will also be more inviting on non-game days. Despite what people may think, the inviting aspect will not come from the red brick and retro details. Instead it will come from generally pleasing massing and texture. With the new ballpark village and more activity at Cupples Station, the new stadium will have more activity around it on non-game days.

In time the new stadium will become beloved. Just not the same as the old stadium it replaces. The generic retro look is just too commonplace to set this stadium apart from all the other red brick retro buildings filling our city and others.

– Steve

 

West End Word Column Available Online

November 10, 2005 Books, Central West End Comments Off on West End Word Column Available Online

If you missed my column in last week’s West End Word don’t worry, it is now available online. Here is a quote:

The debate over the size of the new fountain for Maryland Plaza was heated, but it pales in comparison to the emotions raised by the proposition of more residential high-rise towers in the Central West End. At the heart of the controversy is the proposed Lindell Condominiums at 4643 Lindell Blvd. at Euclid.

Check it out here and post your thoughts below and/or send your comments to the editor of the West End Word.

– Steve

 

Hearing To Reopen Praxair Today at 1pm

Lafayette Square has been a “hot” neighborhood since I moved to St. Louis in 1990. And why not; beautiful homes, convenient location and a magnificent urban park.

But in June of this year it got a little hotter than the residents could stand. Rather than exploding home sales you got exploding storage tanks at Praxair on Chouteau.

During the crisis, which lasted for weeks, Praxair company officials talked of relocating and the city made strong statements about making sure they moved away from such a heavy residential area. It all seemed like it would resolve itself.

Now one side is backing away from their original words and thankfully it is not the City. Praxair has requested a permit to renovate and reopen their facility but the city refused. Praxair has appealed. Today is a hearing on Praxair’s appeal. Not surprising, residents are actively opposing Praxair complete with signs, a letter writing campaign and a new website called, appropriately enough, PraxairWatch.com

From the site you can link to local sources for pictures and video of the explosion, fire and aftermath. Sensational images!

I’ve gone back and forth on this issue to a degree. At various times I’ve wondered if the residents were just pampered NIMBY types (not in my back yard). After all, industry has been around the edge of Lafayette Square longer than any of them have lived there.

But, in the end, I’ve separated in my mind “regular” industry from hazardous and explosive materials. That is where I, and clearly the residents, have drawn the line. Lafayette Square has a number of other businesses at the edge such as an overhead door distributor, a truck repair center and small manufacturers and distributors. These types of businesses have co-existed with the residences for decades and it is a nice mix. St. Louis’ is still very much an industrial city. But explosive gasses?

No resident, regardless of affluence or influence, should be subjected to the risk of such explosions. The mere fact the fire department had to keep water on the scene to cool the contents for what seemed like weeks is proof enough this doesn’t belong anywhere but a highly industrial area where the risk to home and life is minimized. Praxair needs to move to another location.

Today’s meeting is at 1pm in room 208 of City Hall.

– Steve

 

Results of Some Issues I Had Been Following

November 9, 2005 Books, Environment 1 Comment

Besides paying attention to urban issues locally I like to keep tabs on similar battles in other regions. Yesterday had some interesting outcomes:

  • Voters in Washington State approved the most restrictive smoking ban in the country. Not only is smoking prohibited in public buildings but also within 25 feet of an entrance. Oh the joy of not dealing with stray cigarette smoke…
  • Washington State voters also upheld a recent law that would raise gasoline taxes by as much as 9.5 cents per gallon. This was a rural vs urban vote with rural voters opposed to paying the increased taxes for projects in mostly urban areas. However it was noted during the referendum that Washington’s urban areas pay more in such taxes than they receive in benefits. From the Seattle Post-Intellegencer:

    If it had passed, I-912 would have stripped $5.5 billion from the $8.5 billion highway plan. It would have sent transportation planners, who are counting on $2 billion earmarked for repairing the earthquake-damaged Alaskan Way Viaduct, back to square one and lawmakers who supported the plan back to Olympia with a major defeat as they head into an election year.

  • In a much different turn of events, Seattle area residents voted for a 5th time since 1997 on extending their Monorail 10 miles. The four previous votes approved the extension but recent cost increases and questions of management doomed the project. The current monorail is basically a tourist thing since it is so short in distance but adding 10 miles would have served transportation needs of locals. Much like when you buy your house you try not to think about what you paid in interest at the end of the 30 years, the $1.8 billion monorail project was seen as costing $11 billion if you added up all the financing charges. Seattle is also in the process of building a separate light rail system which should be open in a couple of years. Good thing because the drive from the core of Seattle to their airport is brutal.
    Get the latest scope on the monorail here.
  • Yesterday New York State voters approved a $2.9 billion dollar bond act to fund transportation projects, including a new 2nd Avenue subway in Manhattan. NYC is full of subway lines yet they are willing to fund another for areas not well served by mass transit beyond the bus. Good job New York! Like Washington State, rural voters voted against the measure while urban voters supported it.Full story from the New York Times.
  • The lesson here is that transportation interests in urban areas is quite different from rural areas. Yeah, I know — duh! Maybe we in the St. Louis region need to team up with folks in Kansas City, Columbia and Springfield to push for measures protecting our interests and our tax dollars. Strengthening our state’s major urban areas by making them more sustainable in the future will benefit the entire state.

    – Steve

     

    Advertisement



    [custom-facebook-feed]

    Archives

    Categories

    Advertisement


    Subscribe