Candidate Questionnaire Responses from the 23rd Ward

February 17, 2009 Politics/Policy 21 Comments

I recently contacted candidates in contested primary races for the city’s March 3, 2009 primary.  The following are the responses received in the 7-way Democratic primary for the 23rd Ward.  I received responses from Colleen Bridges, Doug Dick, Mary Homan, Forrest “Woody” Lange, Kevin Toal and Joe Vacarro.  Not everyone answered all the questions.

The first 3 questions were related to name, phone number and a secret code to ensure it was the candidate answering the questions.


4. Campaign website URL is (this WILL be published). Type ‘none’ if you don’t have a website/blog.

Bridges:     colleenbridges-23rdward.com

Dick:    dougdick.com

Homan: www.maryhoman.com

Lange:   vote4lange

Toal:  www.KRTOAL23RDWARD.COM

Vaccarro:    www.stlvaccaro.com

5. List your 3 main qualifications for the position?

… Continue Reading

 

New Poll; Ready for digital TV?

February 15, 2009 Media 4 Comments

Each Sunday I change the poll question that appears on the upper right of the main page. This week I want to know if you are ready for the change to digital TV. I know Congress has extended the deadline from February 17th to June 12th but about a third of the “full power” stations will stick to the 17th –Tuesday! The balance will make the switch between March 14th and June 12th.

Two stations in the St. Louis market will make the change at midnight Tuesday: WRBU (46) and KDNL (ABC30).

From KDNL’s website:

For the past year, television stations, including this station, have notified viewers of the February 17, 2009 analog shutoff date through on-air announcements, informational crawls, full-length programs, and their website. As a result, in order to avoid additional confusion due to the date change and as permitted by the recently enacted legislation, this station has notified the FCC that we would like to cease analog operations on February 17, 2009, as originally planned, and the FCC has consented to this station’s plans for early termination. As required by the FCC, we are currently airing announcements throughout the day to inform our viewers that we will terminate analog broadcasting on effective at 11:59PM on February 17.

So if you are still analog you can watch Scrubs & Deal or No Deal on Tuesday but if you want to watch Lost, Grey’s Anatomy, Ugly Betty, Barbara Walters Special or Oscars within the week you’d better get busy or call a friend who is digital prepared.

I have not had a TV since moving to my loft in November 2007 so come the 18th my life won’t be any different than today. Although I’ve enjoyed the break, I am planning to purchase a small (26″) HDTV soon – I miss CBS Sunday Morning and 60 Minutes

So take a minute and answer the poll above in the upper right corner of the main page. Add any comments you have below.

 

Join Me at the Royale to Discuss the Upcoming City Primary Election

Monday evening (2/16/09) I’m hosting the first of two City Primary Discussions at The Royale.

From the invite:

In our fair city we have many elections, and a very important election is coming up in early March. It is the primary, the key election for most offices in Saint Louis city. In this election half of all of the wards will be up for election along with the executive branch, our city’s Mayor.

Here at the Royale we discuss the future of our city. For the next two Mondays(16th and 23rd) starting at 8:30 to close we will have an open discussion about all of the city election races. These discussions will be hosted by Steve Patterson of the urbanreviewstl.com blog. All are welcome and encouraged to attend to learn more about the candidates.

The start time is 8:30pm on the 16th & 23rd.  The Royale is located at 3132 S. Kingshighway (map).  So come out, get a beverage from the bar, and sit down with me to discuss the various races throughout the city.

 

Non-Smokers Speak Up For Change!

February 13, 2009 Smoke Free 35 Comments

My recent post requesting a smoking ban for the region & state generated the most comments for a single post for the entire 4+ years I’ve been writing this blog.  While many found smoking to be as equally disgusting as me, others took a more libertarian viewpoint — let customers, business owners and the market — not the government  — decide.  Fine.

I’m no longer going to patronize establishments that permit smoking anywhere. I encourage others to do the same.

The whole non-smoking section is really a joke anyway.  If smoking is allowed indoors with the same ventilation system then the ill-effects of smoking are throughout.

But avoiding smoking places is not good enough.  We non-smokers need to tell the smoking places why we are no longer going to patronize their establishments.  And we need to make sure the non-smoking places we do visit know we are there, in part, because they are 100% non-smoking.  So how do we do this?

First, if you are heading out to dinner call ahead and ask if the establishment is 100% smoke-free.  If the answer is no say something like, “Oh, too bad.  Thank you, but I won’t be eating at your place as long as smoking is permitted.” I know it sounds harsh and perhaps you can suggest different phrasing but they need to understand that allowing smoking costs business.  When you visit a place and they ask “smoking or non-smoking?”  you can respond with, “Oh, I didn’t realize you still allowed smoking.”  Ideally you’d do a 180 and leave.  I did this recently even though I was ready to eat then.  If you don’t want to find another place to eat go with, “I guess we’ll stay this time, please seat us as far away from the smokers as physically possible.”  Remember, most likely the person seating you didn’t make the choice to allow smoking so you don’t want to direct your anger at them.

I’m convinced many restaurant owners only see and count the smokers.  These owners fail to realize they have more non-smoking customers than smoking customers.  Recent reports indicate that less than 20% of U.S. adults smoke (source).  Owners are afraid to ban smoking because they might lose a minority of the population.  They don’t fear losing the non-smokers.  We need to change that.  Instill some fear.

Most places I visit are 100% smoke-free.  But I will stop going to a few places — Chimichanga and City Diner to name a couple — that are not 100% smoke-free.  Since I started writing this post a week ago I’ve found myself in places with smoking allowed at the bar.  It certainly won’t be easy.  Friends might not so understanding when I insist we go elsewhere.  No everyone is comfortable being perceived as confrontational or difficult.  So to help out I’ve created some card templates that can be left behind when you leave.

For those unpleasant places that still allow smoking:

nosmoke1sm

The above language works for contacting restaurants through there websites.  Just copy & paste:

I enjoy your establishment but the presence of cigarette smoke makes the experience less than ideal for me.  I eat out less due to the economy so when I do I want to enjoy it.  Please remove smoking so I can return.

For those awesome places that are smoke-free:

nosmoke2sm

Click each of the above for a PDF document set up with 10 cards per sheet (Avery 5371).  Just print, cut and carry.  Leave them behind at places so they hopefully get the message. It is a tough economy out there and we non-smokers account for 80% of the population.  We don’t need to be subjected to the disgusting addictive habit of the remaining 20% of the population.  We, the complacent non-smokers, have the purchasing power to rid smoking in places.  We just have to speak up.

 

Early Poll Results Shows Trend Away From Land Phones

February 12, 2009 Sunday Poll 12 Comments

Used a phone booth lately?  Even seen a pay phone in the last decade?  Wireless technology has changed the urban landscape.  No more pay phones.  No more phone booths.

This weeks poll, still active in the upper right corner of the main page, shows the continued transformation away from land-based phone lines to wireless phones.

The question asked is, Do you have a land-based phone line at home?

Results as of 9pm on 2/11/09.
Results as of 9pm on 2/11/09.

As of last night, half of the 58 responses indicated no they did not.  Of the half with a land line, 55% of those are considering dropping the line and going cell only.  Combine the people without a land phone with those who are considering dropping the land line and you get 72.4%.

I like having only a single number.  I also like saving money. Having messages in only one location rather than at the office, at home and on my wireless device is also convenient.

In a decade we probably won’t have new places wired for land phones at all.  I think I was a teenager before I could have a phone in my room — not my own line but just a phone on our single line.  Now young kids have their own wireless phones.

Wireless phones enable people to meet up in public places — calling when close to pinpoint their exact location.  Waiting for a call no longer means staying at home.  Hopefully the end result will put more folks outdoors in great public places.  Phones with cameras and email allow people to share where they are.  I’m guessing the Wal-Mart parking lot will not be shared.  Vibrant pedestrian-filled streets, however, will be emailed on posted on sites like Facebook.

The technology of the automobile has physically seperated our society.  Handy wireless devices may be just the item to help reduce our distances.

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe